Rick,
This is NOT the normal, default behavior for a the Request ID assignment on a 
standard Remedy form.

Unless there is workflow to get the next ID value prior to saving the entry, 
the default behavior is for the Request ID not to be assigned until the entry 
is initially saved.

In the form properties, is 'Enable Next Request ID Block Size' checked?  If so, 
what is the value for the Next Request ID Block Size?

--Thomas

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Rick Cook 
  Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:38 PM
  Subject: Re: Control over Request ID


  ** Correct.  12346 was allocated, but was then discarded before it became a 
viewable Incident.

  Rick


  On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Ganga Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

    ** Neel
    Let me be bit more clearer. Lets say I have last request ID 
000000000012345.I am going ahead with a new ticket. I don't save the ticket and 
cancel it.
    Next I am creating a ticket and saving it then my new request ID will be 
000000000012347 instead of 000000000012346.

    My understanding behind this in above scenario is I tried to create a 
instance of the ticket and the Next Reqest ID  is incremented by 1 and when i 
again tried to create a ticket again the Next Reqest ID incremented by 1 and it 
gave me the number 000000000012347.

    Is this the way it work ?

    -- 
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
    ( Remedy Skilled Professional )



    On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

      ** I agree with Neel, whose reasons are sound.  The Interface_Create form 
does not always create an Incident, which is why there are gaps.

      Rick



      On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Neel Guatam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        Ganga,

        When you say 'requestID generated are not in sequence' - are you
        referring to; for example; all the incidents created? If so, that's how
        it works as when you open a new incident and select a customer, it
        generated an incident ID and increment the nextID for that module.
        However, when user cancels out and doesn't save that incident, the next
        incident created will not be in sequence and have a gap of one. If many
        users in production do that then you'll see the broken sequence and it's
        normal. IF this is the case then I don't think you should be messing
        with it.

        Just my $0.02

        Neel Gautam
        Accenture - Chicago Delivery Centre
        Core Values:            Stewardship      *       Best People     *
        Client Value Creation    *       One Global Network      *       Respect
        for the Individual               *       Integrity


        -----Original Message-----
        From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ganga Prasad
        Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:50 AM
        To: [email protected]
        Subject: Re: Control over Request ID

        **
        Thanks Rick
        In fact issue with me is that the request ID generated are not in
        sequence. So can we make the is possible to break the sequence or if
        broken then make it in order ?

        Thanks and Regards,
        Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
        ( Remedy Skilled Professional )


        On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


               ** You can, but should do so carefully.  The nextId column in
        the arschema table contains the number of the next Request ID for the
        specified form.  Manipulating that manually is done by resetting the
        value via SQL command, which should only be done under specific
        controlled conditions, which are listed in the Remedy documentation.
        Failure to think through the process carefully may result in the form
        being unable to accept further entries until the problem is fixed.

               If you want to present a different type of number to customers,
        or exercise more control over it, I would recommend that you create and
        use a different field.

               Rick


               On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ganga Prasad
        <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


                       **

                       Hi All

                       Do we have any control over the sequence of Request ID ?
        My understanding is that this number us generated automatically. Can we
        control the way it is getting generated ?




        This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain 
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have 
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the 
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

        
_______________________________________________________________________________
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org

        Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"



      __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 




    __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" 
html___ 

  __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" html___

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to