Rick, Thomas,

 

Assumption: Ganga is using ITSM 7.x

 

What is happening is the following. When Ganga opens an Incident (or
Change), workflow performs a push to a "Ticket Num Generator" form which
generates a request ID for that form just like we're used to. Workflow then
sets the "Request ID" field (NOT field ID 1) for the Incident (or Change)
form to $LASTID$. If the Incident (or Change) is saved then the Request ID
is used. If the Incident was not saved the Request ID is abandoned. The next
time Ganga opens the form the process is repeated. If the previous (by
anyone) Request ID was used the current Request ID is one number greater
than the previous. If the previous Request ID was abandoned there will be a
gap.

 

Roger

 

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 1:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Control over Request ID

 

** You are correct, Thomas, except that ITSM 7 doesn't use Entry IDs on the
Help Desk form the way we're used to.  I've seen this happen myself.
Technically, every Entry ID is represented by a record, but some are created
and discarded before they're viewable by anyone.  I didn't build it...

Rick

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Thomas Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

** 

Rick,

This is NOT the normal, default behavior for a the Request ID assignment on
a standard Remedy form.

 

Unless there is workflow to get the next ID value prior to saving the entry,
the default behavior is for the Request ID not to be assigned until the
entry is initially saved.

 

In the form properties, is 'Enable Next Request ID Block Size' checked?  If
so, what is the value for the Next Request ID Block Size?

 

--Thomas

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Rick Cook <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

Newsgroups: gmane.comp.crm.arsystem.general

To: [email protected] 

Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 12:38 PM

Subject: Re: Control over Request ID

 

** Correct.  12346 was allocated, but was then discarded before it became a
viewable Incident.

Rick

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Ganga Prasad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

** Neel
Let me be bit more clearer. Lets say I have last request ID
000000000012345.I am going ahead with a new ticket. I don't save the ticket
and cancel it.
Next I am creating a ticket and saving it then my new request ID will be
000000000012347 instead of 000000000012346.

My understanding behind this in above scenario is I tried to create a
instance of the ticket and the Next Reqest ID  is incremented by 1 and when
i again tried to create a ticket again the Next Reqest ID incremented by 1
and it gave me the number 000000000012347.

Is this the way it work ?

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
( Remedy Skilled Professional )



On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:36 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

** I agree with Neel, whose reasons are sound.  The Interface_Create form
does not always create an Incident, which is why there are gaps.

Rick 

 

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:57 AM, Neel Guatam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

Ganga,

When you say 'requestID generated are not in sequence' - are you
referring to; for example; all the incidents created? If so, that's how
it works as when you open a new incident and select a customer, it
generated an incident ID and increment the nextID for that module.
However, when user cancels out and doesn't save that incident, the next
incident created will not be in sequence and have a gap of one. If many
users in production do that then you'll see the broken sequence and it's
normal. IF this is the case then I don't think you should be messing
with it.

Just my $0.02

Neel Gautam
Accenture - Chicago Delivery Centre
Core Values:            Stewardship      *       Best People     *
Client Value Creation    *       One Global Network      *       Respect
for the Individual               *       Integrity


-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ganga Prasad
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 10:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Control over Request ID

**
Thanks Rick
In fact issue with me is that the request ID generated are not in
sequence. So can we make the is possible to break the sequence or if
broken then make it in order ?

Thanks and Regards,
Ganga Prasad Pattnaik,
( Remedy Skilled Professional )


On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 10:10 PM, Rick Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


       ** You can, but should do so carefully.  The nextId column in
the arschema table contains the number of the next Request ID for the
specified form.  Manipulating that manually is done by resetting the
value via SQL command, which should only be done under specific
controlled conditions, which are listed in the Remedy documentation.
Failure to think through the process carefully may result in the form
being unable to accept further entries until the problem is fixed.

       If you want to present a different type of number to customers,
or exercise more control over it, I would recommend that you create and
use a different field.

       Rick


       On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 8:19 AM, Ganga Prasad
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


               **

               Hi All

               Do we have any control over the sequence of Request ID ?
My understanding is that this number us generated automatically. Can we
control the way it is getting generated ?




This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information.  If you have
received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
original.  Any other use of the email by you is prohibited.

____________________________________________________________________________
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org

Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 





__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to