Well I think this points up an major underlying weakness of *all*
structured disciplines, be it CMMI, Six Sigma, ISO, or whatever -- it
all depends on the people *implementing* the discipline.  Unfortunately
the world is full of "rules lawyers" who enforce the law not for the
intent of the law but by the letter of the law.

For example...

CMMI implementation person: "It says we need to know how many lines of
code are in your Remedy application."

Remedy developer: "But Remedy doesn't have 'lines of code.'  It's an
entirely different development model."

CMMI implementer: "We need to know how many lines of code are in your
application."

Remedy developer: "But I just said..."

CMMI implementer: "Are you being difficult?"



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Grooms, Frederick W
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 8:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?

The really stupid thing is that the CMM/CMMI only defines lines of code
as a "Suggested" unit of measure.  They also include number of objects.

>From CMMI for Development v1.2
  Examples of size measures include the following:   
    * Number of functions   
    * Function points   
    * Source lines of code   
    * Number of classes and objects   
    * Number of requirements   
    * Number and complexity of interfaces   
    * Number of pages   
    * Number of inputs and outputs   
    * Number of technical risk items   
    * Volume of data   
    * Number of logic gates for integrated circuits   
    * Number of parts (e.g., printed circuit boards, components, and
mechanical parts)   
    * Physical constraints (e.g., weight and volume)   

Fred



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2008 7:54 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?

Oh contraire! Since the 1980s?! You'd be shocked.  It seems like a
biggie with CMM/CMMI organizations.  Both Gary (who posted earlier) and
I have worked in CMM/CMMI controlled organizations, and evidently lines
of code is a big metric within it...at least for some organizations.

Although I do definitely agree with you that it's 100% stupid.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bradford Bingel
Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2003 5:13 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?

Geez . . . no one has used the "lines of source code" (SLOC) measurement
since the 1980's!  It was a poor metric then with monolithic languages
(Cobol, Fortran, etc.), and it's an even poorer metric today using
object-oriented software and N-tier architectures.

But you may still need to provide a valid number.  Can anyone from
Remedy provide a ballpark SLOC metric by application?

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kaiser Norm E CIV USAF 96
CS/SCCE
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 9:36 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?

Hmmm...Depending entirely on what they want this number for, I would
probably recommend not giving them a number.

Many organizations nowadays are foolishly using number of lines of code
as a benchmark for the complexity of an application.  If an app is more
than X number of lines of code is very complex...and then management
starts asking questions like, "Why is that code so complex? Perhaps we
should optimize it?
Is there a commercial solution available to replace that inordinately
and thus expensive-to-maintain application?"

In short, if you give them a number (based on code objects or lines in a
def or whatever), that number isn't going to be right.  It might be good
to make them go away, but they may later use that bogus info to make
some sort of executive decision, which may end up putting your app and
possibly YOU on the chopping block.

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lammey, Peter A.
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 11:30 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?

**
Maybe the answer to that would be if you exported all your workflow into
a def file and then did a count of lines in the file (in Word perhaps)
and give them that number.
 
Obviously there is more actual coding behind the scenes than that but
its better than providing a useless number.
 


Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN MIT Technical Services & Applications Management
860-766-4761 

 

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2008 12:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Lines of code" in Remedy?


** You could tell them that it's a closely held piece of BMC proprietary
data, and that if you told them, you'd have to kill them.

Or, ask them what answer sounds good to them, and give them that number
back.  Heck, you may even be right, and they'd never be able to prove
you wrong.

Or, you could simply give them the only number that they'd have a chance
to verify - the number of workflow objects in your system.

Rick


On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:19 AM, David.M Clark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:


        All,
        
        I've been asked to estimate the "number of lines of code we have
in Remedy".  Any ideas on how to approach a question like that?  Feel
free to save your response for Friday Humor if you prefer.
        
        Thanks,
        
        -David
        
        David M Clark
        Remedy Programmer/Analyst
        
        
        
        
________________________________________________________________________
_______
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
        Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers
Are"
        


__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 

________________________________

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

__Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
html___ 

________________________________________________________________________
____
___
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor:
www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum
Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

________________________________________________________________________
_______
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to