Christopher,

I actually started redeveloping the SLA for a group in SLM 7.03.
I implemented the SLAs using the OOTB templates for Notify Incident Manager and 
Notify Incident Assignee and I added both to a service target and I noticed 
that the Notify Incident Assignee was not working properly.
Is this undocumented issue where only one of the notification templates work 
and not the other because the SLM generated filters all fire at execution order 
700?
 
Ill try tweaking the execution order for the SLM filters for the Notify 
Assignee milestone but wasn't sure if you already figured out a workaround for 
this undocumented problem.


Thanks
Peter Lammey
ESPN IT Client Architecture and Automation
860-766-4761

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of strauss
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 9:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SLM Notifications

One caution - if you use the templates, you can only have one action per rule, 
even though there are several action templates.  They all write a temp value to 
exactly the same field in the Incident form, so if you specify 4 actions like I 
did the first time, only the last one is performed since that is the only value 
in the temp field that survives.  This is not documented anywhere.  I also seem 
to recall that the template for response, as opposed to resolution, was only 
half built OOTB, and I had to add workflow to get it to work.  It's been over a 
year since I did this, so I would have to dig into my customization docs at 
work to see what had to be done.

Christopher Strauss, Ph.D.
Call Tracking Administration Manager
University of North Texas Computing & IT Center http://itsm.unt.edu/

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of SHall
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2009 7:05 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: SLM Notifications
>
> If I use a Template for my notification e.g Assignee Group Manager. i 
> believe that the way this is supposed to work is it looks at the 
> Assigned Group and notifies whoever has the the Incident Manager 
> Functional Role for that Group. These do not work at all.
>
> Do you mean CTM:Support Group Assignments? This form was empty when i 
> searched it
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _
> ________
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum 
> Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum 
Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor:[email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to