If you follow the existing implementation, it's not more dynamic now than if 
you manually enter all the values in a drop-down list, because that's really 
how it's implemented.  Any time you want to add or change a value to the 
existing list, you both need to add it to the config form, and add it to the 
hidden status reason field, which is a selection field.  If you fail to add a 
value to the selection field, you can't use it.  It will show up in the menu, 
but it won't save.

I would recommend not trying to implement it the same way that ITSM does it.  
Instead, figure out the essentials of the menu qualification, adapt it for your 
new form, and drop the hidden status reason field.  Don't copy over the 
workflow related to setting the hidden status reason field.  If you display the 
visible status reason character field as a drop down list, then you won't have 
people entering invalid values in the field.

Lyle

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Robert Fults
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 7:39 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Reusing the Status Reason field

**

Yes, I just copied the fields to a different form, didn't alter IM at all.  I 
looked at the SYS:Status Reason Menu Items form, and I am still trying to 
figure out why the menu won't load.  If I load a different menu it works, but 
is missing some of the items I need from the Incident form.  I could load the 
values into a drop-down list manually, but it wouldn't be very dynamic that way.

-Rob
________________________________
From: Thad K Esser [[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 1:48 PM
Subject: Re: Reusing the Status Reason field
**
I think he's trying to add the status reason functionality to a completely 
different form, not repurpose its use on Incident.

Robert, have you looked at the "SYS:Status Reason Menu Items" forms.  The 
records there control the values in the display-only version of the menu (and 
are form-specific) and have to match the attributes of the hidden field.

Thad Esser
Remedy Developer

From:

Rick Cook <[email protected]>

To:

[email protected]

Date:

03/05/2010 10:27 AM

Subject:

Re: Reusing the Status Reason field

Sent by:

"Action Request System discussion list(ARSList)" <[email protected]>


________________________________



**
Do NOT repurpose fields in ITSM. You are only starting to see the reasons why 
it is a bad idea.

Rick

From: Robert Fults <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 13:24:13 -0500
To: <[email protected]>
Subject: Reusing the Status Reason field
I posted this over in BMCDN:

I am trying to reuse the status reason field from IM in a form in order to 
build some dynamic workflow.  I copied over the field and verified that the 
menu was the same.  I also copied over the hidden status reason field and 
duplicated the 2  Active Links (that I could find) that were related to these 
fields.  For some reason I can't get the status reasons to load when I set my 
status to Pending or Resolved.  The ALs were: 
HPD:SHR:OnDisplay_100_SetTempStatusReason and HPD:SHR:SetStatusReason_100.

 What am I missing?  Why is it these issues don't exist with other fields like 
the Assigned Support Group fields?

Any help would be great!
Sincerely,

Robert Fults
Remedy Dev.
Florida International University
Email: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
http://uts.fiu.edu<http://uts.fiu.edu/>


_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

*IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication, including any attachment, contains 
information that may be confidential or privileged, and is intended solely for 
the entity or individual to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
recipient, you should delete this message and are hereby notified that any 
disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited. 
Nothing in this email, including any attachment, is intended to be a legally 
binding signature. *
_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_Platinum Sponsor: [email protected] ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


 NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) 
and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized 
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the 
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all 
copies of the original message.



_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to