Ø Ok...so original Patch 5 is still good, if you are willing to deal with the license stuff problems.
That is correct. And it's just the audit file/report - not licensing in general. Licensing still works fine with or without any patches. -David J. Easter Sr. Product Manager, Enterprise Service Management BMC Software, Inc. The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of LJ LongWing Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 12:53 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010 ** Ok...so original Patch 5 is still good, if you are willing to deal with the license stuff problems. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Easter, David Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 1:28 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010 ** While I don't disagree, operational issues internally do not enable the issuance of an externally visible "005A" or such in terms of patch numbering at this time. However, the version string within the executable does change, so you can tell which version you have by running the version command against the server binary. The pull is of the revised Patch 005, although the original Patch 005 was itself pulled to include the license audit corrections that then caused this additional issue. -David J. Easter Sr. Product Manager, Enterprise Service Management BMC Software, Inc. The opinions, statements, and/or suggested courses of action expressed in this E-mail do not necessarily reflect those of BMC Software, Inc. My voluntary participation in this forum is not intended to convey a role as a spokesperson, liaison or public relations representative for BMC Software, Inc. From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rick Cook Sent: Friday, July 09, 2010 11:19 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: AR System 7.5.00 Patch 005 and 7.1.00 Patch 010 ** Indeed. I appreciate how BMC has improved their release processes over the past few years, but this practice of re-using patch numbers is a major no-no from a Release Mgmt. perspective. At least name them 5a, 5b... or 5.1, 5.2... or something. Rick On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 2:13 PM, LJ LongWing <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: David, Is this a pull of the initial Patch 5, or the revised Patch 5 that came out recently?....and why do we again have a scenario where we have two of the same patch version running around? -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _attend WWRUG10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug10 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
