On 8/18/05 1:12 PM, "oakdorf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With no parking, you will have no real retail interest, enough to > justify the expected rent. This little problem is impacting Pier > Village already- and not even occuppied 100% yet. >
Kinda sounds like there are enough issues being brought up to take a second look at the plan, doesn't it? I mean, the Ground Zero comparison shows that even something of that level can be scrapped and started over. The things I'm hearing people say are either that they weren't aware of the lack of tourism focus or that the plan never cared for tourism but we're still expecting tourism to be ok. I don't see how you can have it both ways. You either plan for tourism or you don't. If all you want is residential and the plan (things like parking) is solely based on residential - don't expect business from elsewhere. ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
