[...] > Right, the biggest problem I have is with XSLT/XSL-FO and the lack of proper > examples where you have the input, the files and the output. So you can > tweak to your own liking without messing about too much. >
Thats not really what XSL-FO is for. > [...] > It's true docbook2odf is uncomplete at this point. Why not improve the existing docbook import filter so it can be used by all OO/LO users? > > [...] > Like how O'Reilly has a large modified set of tweaks that's private ? > I guess so (they are private so I don't know ;-) > [...] > I don't see how me struggling with FOP will help others. Well creating the examples for them would :-) I don't want the > styling to be done by people that have XSLT skills, instead they should be > able to do the same thing without any specific skills, other than styling a > document and use that as a template for future documents. Good point, XSLT programmers often make lousy stylists. > > I was hoping FOP/XSL-FO was a lot more simple, but it looks as if it > provides too many options (or rather allows complete programming XSLT > syntax). I am not the person to inflict this on others ;-) > Yes well XSL-FO is a programming language. It is going to be powerful, thats the point of course, so its not for non-programmers. There are people creating GUI style creators for FOP, where they are at I'm not sure. Cheers Lex -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "asciidoc" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/asciidoc?hl=en.
