At 9:54 AM -0700 10/16/05, mayur bora wrote: >Hi Mahanta da > >I am not aware of the earlier comments on assamnet by >Deka/Kakati. I don't know whether they are two >separate individuals or not. I think basic issue is >much more important than that. As regards the last >point of your mail, both are inextricably linked. >Promoting, propagating, popularising and most >importantly practising Sankardeva's philosophy in our >day to day life is the best way of paying tribute to >him. But at times, singing praise is also required. > >Bye > >Mayur
*** Thanks for the reply Mayur. I hoped for the answer you gave. And I am pleased. > > But at times, singing praise is also required. *** I can live with that :-) But you did not respond to the previous question: >Or was there a determination on your part that someone indeed has >made disparaging or or baseless charges against Xonkordev, and thus >the comments were directed against him/her/them? And if you did see >such comments, which were those? cm >Chandigarh > >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hi Mayur: >> >> >> > >I am of the view that if >> >someone says something on the basis of reason , >> there >> >is no harm in analysing it. >> >> >> *** You are right. I agree with you. >> >> >> > > But if a person puts forth >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about someone >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason, then >> we >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and >> time >> >on that. >> >> >> *** I agree with you here too. >> >> And since no one has made any disparaging comments >> or baseless >> charges against Xonkordev or what he tried to do for >> the people of >> Assam that *I* have noticed here, would it be >> reasonable to suggest >> that your comment was really directed at Bidyut >> Kakati, who is none >> other than Rabin Deka in disguise ( in disguise >> because he was thrown >> out o account of a persistent and long record of >> making stupid >> personal attacks against a number of netters) ? >> >> If so why can't you say it like it is? >> >> Or was there a determination on your part that >> someone indeed has >> made disparaging or or baseless charges against >> Xonkordev, and thus >> the comments were directed against him/her/them? And >> if you did see >> such comments, which were those? >> >> >> And finally a question for you and all others here: >> >> *** What is more important to note, to protect, to >> uphold, to >> promote, to expend one's energies on: >> Xonkordev's message, or his persona? If you were >> Xonkordev, what >> would your advice to your followers be? >> >> >> cm :-) >> >> >> >> >> At 9:22 PM -0700 10/15/05, mayur bora wrote: >> >Hi Mahanta da >> > >> >Please refer to the quotation of my earlier mail. >> You >> >will find the rationale. I am of the view that if >> >someone says something on the basis of reason , >> there >> >is no harm in analysing it. But if a person puts >> forth >> >irresponsible and disparaging views about someone >> >which is based neither on facts nor on reason, then >> we >> >should ignore it without wasting our energy and >> time >> >on that. >> > >> >Mayur >> >Chandigarh >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >--- Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Mayur: >> >> >> >> >> >> I presume this is the same 'seraa-paagol' Rabin >> >> Deka that was kicked >> >> out of Assam Net, but has returned like the >> 'nirgot' >> >> he is. This >> >> moron has a habit of >> >> picking out words and phrases or comments out of >> >> context to >> >> personally attack others personally in Assam >> Net. >> >> Therefore, in the >> >> public interest, I will forward those exchanges >> for >> >> those who might >> >> be interested. >> >> >> >> >This is not meant for any individual. >> >> >> >> >> >> *** Then why did you post it :-)? The net is >> made up >> >> of many >> >> 'individuals' Mayur. Did you forget that? Or are >> you >> >> trying to have >> >> it both ways? >> >> >> >> >> >> >But if anyone is disrespectful to Sankaradeva, > > we >> >> should ignore it. >> >> >> >> *** May I ask you WHY you or WE should ignore >> it, >> >> instead of dwelling >> >> on it or going to war over it? I would be very >> >> interested in your >> >> rationale. >> >> >> >> cm >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> At 10:04 AM -0700 10/15/05, mayur bora wrote: >> >> >This is not meant for any individual. But if >> anyone >> >> is >> >> >disrespectful to Sankaradeva, we should ignore >> it. >> >> >Because someone rightly said, "If the bat does >> not >> >> >choose to associate with the sun, the splendour >> of >> >> the >> >> >sun will not thereby be diminished." >> >> > >> >> >Mayur >> >> >Chandigarh >> >> > >> >> >--- Rabin Deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> to : sri Mayur Bora and srimati Rini Kakati >> >> >> >> >> >> with respect, >> >> >> would like you to know that in year 2003 >> Chandan >> >> >> Mahanta was disrespectful to Vaishnava on >> the >> >> >> Incarnation Day. Following link has some >> info. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WhySo/message/84 >> >> >> >> >> >> The following email was from Jugal Kalita, >> which >> >> was >> >> >> even more disrespectful, where Jugal Kalita >> had >> >> >> asked >> >> >> Vaishnavas to modernize (for homosexual). >> >> >> >> >> >> Srimanta Sankaradeva Sangha North America >> branch >> >> >> (and >> >> >> Assam) had discussed this issue and we >> remain >> >> silent >> >> >> for the fear of more abuse. We have more >> >> foreigners >> >> >> here than Assamese here so we will survive. >> >> >> >> >> >> However, it would be great if you please >> kindly >> > > be >> >> >> thoughtful discussing on Vaishnava matter in >> >> >> Assamnet. >> >> >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> >> >> >> >> Rabin Deka >> >> >> (currently i look after the north america >> >> branch) >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________ >> >> >> Yahoo! Music Unlimited >> >=== message truncated === > > > > > >__________________________________ >Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 >http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
