>According to the last email, you were supposed to check and >respond.
>Just reminding you that you owe the net a response before >you jump to repeat the same thing.
>(At least Himenda is silent on several issues where he could >not respond.)
Could you please explain this or what you mean by this? Once you give some satisfactory response, I will then try to respond to the other points.
Till then.
On 4/10/06, Rajen Barua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>IMHO, this is NOT a win/lose game. Hindus are NOT in the conversion game because most Hindus believe that one has to be born a Hindu. They really don't care if someone >converts to Hinduism or not. My understanding is that Hinduism is quite restrictive in that sense.As pointed out in some other earlier message, your understanding is not correct.The Tai Ahoms in Assam, all the Hindus in South East Asia, to say the least, were all converted to Hindus. They were not BORN Hindus as you try to cliam.And if you claim Buddhism as a branch of Hindusim, then all the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Burmese, Thais, Laosians, Vietnamis wer converted.Even in India, all non Aryans were were picked up and converted to Hindus en mass at one time or another, and that is how Hinduism grew.It was the big fish eating the little fish.The history of Hinduism is very clear on this.According to the last email, you were supposed to check and respond.Just reminding you that you owe the net a response before you jump to repeat the same thing.(At least Himenda is silent on several issues where he could not respond.)RB----- Original Message -----From: umesh sharmaTo: Ram Sarangapani ; Barua25Sent: Monday, April 10, 2006 3:32 PMSubject: Re: [Assam] IE: Anti-conversion law in Rajasthan?
Good oints Ram-dda,I think the Supreme Court justices took the same view as you.>The Hindus know that in the Conversion game, they will loose >because they have nothing to show to these poor Muslims.That is >sad but true.IMHO, this is NOT a win/lose game. Hindus are NOT in the conversion game because most Hindus believe that one has to be born a Hindu. They really don't care if someone converts to Hinduism or not. My understanding is that Hinduism is quite restrictive in that sense.>because they have nothing to show to these poor Muslims.And what would you like Hinduism to show or promise new converts? It will be interesting to find out what one "gets" by converting.>So Freedom of Religion without Freedom for Conversion does not >make any sense.While this is true, it is still difficult to uphold some kinds of conversion like in forcible conversions or by promising or enticing the unwary with cash or other things in this earth, or 79 virgins in heaven.About Freedom of Religion, let us extend this a bit:What if I think "my religion" requires me to advocate against gay marriages or abortion. Will any restriction placed on my practice curtail my Freeddom of Religion?Just curious.--RamOn 4/9/06, Barua25 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:It (the Freedom to Convert) also goes for the benefits of the Hindus. They can convert thousands or millions of poor Muslims in every city in India, if they want to covert. The only reason the Hindus oppose Conversion, in my mind, is that the Hindus are not interested to convert these poor Muslims in India to Hinduism and serve them, because they know that these Muslims are enjoying a better life of equality being Muslim than being a Hindu. The Hindus know that in the Conversion game, they will loose because they have nothing to show to these poor Muslims.That is sad but true.RB----- Original Message -----From: Barua25Sent: Sunday, April 09, 2006 9:37 PMSubject: Re: [Assam] IE: Anti-conversion law in Rajasthan?
Right to Freedom of Religion is intricately connected to conversion. For me to change my religion, I must be influenced by that religion and I will need somebody to formally accept me in that religion. >From another angle that can be viewed as conversion. So Freedom of Religion without Freedom for Conversion does not make any sense.RB----- Original Message -----From: umesh sharmaSent: Saturday, April 08, 2006 2:30 PMSubject: [Assam] IE: Anti-conversion law in Rajasthan?
Please note that Supreme Court in India clarifiied last year that there is definitely Right to Freedom of Religion but there is no Right to convert others.The case had been filed by Christian missionaries who want to convert members of other faiths - mostky Hindus but also Muslims (in kashmir etc) , Sikhs (in Punjab, Chhatisgarh etc) and Buddhists . The most famous Sikh to convert to Christianity -as per reports - was the Sikh King - Dalip Singh who then settled in London- while under British rule.
Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD 20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
Win a BlackBerry device from O2 with Yahoo!. Enter now.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD 20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list [email protected] http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
