On Aug 18, 2010, at 17:30, John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-) wrote: > I think the original posting was pointing out that you lose only > a single byte of addressability by adding 4095, and that you save > one instruction. The added byte is rarely an issue; whether or not > the extra instruction is important depends on the application. > Making the CSECT 4 bytes longer to gain 1 byte of addressability leaves you 3 bytes worse off.
> (------------------ Referenced Note Follows --------------------) > Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2010 3:51 PM > > QMGREX01 CSECT , > STM R14,R12,12(R13) > LR R11,R15 > USING QMGREX01,R11,R12 > LA R12,4095(R11) > LA R12,1(R12) <----------------- noticed that I added 1 to > the 4095 bump. -- gil
