On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Sam Siegel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 5:44 PM, William H. Blair <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Sam Siegel explains:
>>
>> <--snip-->

> It is extremely unlikely that you have accidentally stumbled upon the
>> mechanism to make this little bit of magic happen. It is always possible
>> that there is a bug in z/OS and your SRB is, in fact, being dispatched on
>> a
>> zIIP. But I seriously doubt that.
>>
>
> Agreed, it could be a bug.  But I've seen this in v1r9 and v1r10.  I'm not
> saying that there is certainty that the SRB is dispatched to a zIIP all of
> the time.  But it seems to happen extremely regularly.
>
> <--snip-->

The SRB was modified to do a loop of about 420,000,000 iterations.  Inside
the loop was a STAP followed by a CLI to see which CPU was being used.
 Based on the CPU, different counters were incremented.  There are 2 CPUs on
the system.

The counter for cpu 0 is   44,300,650.
The counter for cpu 1 is 375,129,750.

Below is the output from D M=CPU

IEE174I 06.33.02 DISPLAY M           FRAME  1     F      E   SYS=xxxx
PROCESSOR STATUS
ID  CPU                  SERIAL
00  +                     02abcd9988
01  +I                    12abcd9988

System name and serial numbers have been masked.

<--snip-->


>
>> --
>> WB
>>
>
>

Reply via email to