Regarding the weird letter "c" with an acute accent:
I found it immediately by doing the following:
1.  Use the insert symbol function on my document-creating editor (I always use 
some flavor of Word), scroll from top to bottom until I see the desired weird 
character, and insert one of them into some arbitrary text document.
2.  Cursor-highlight-select that one character and copy it.
3.  Open an Internet Explorer window.
4.  Paste the one character copied in step 2 above into the search box.
5.  Search the whole cyber-universe for that single character (I almost always 
use Google for this).
6.  The first hit on my Google search was exactly what I wanted this time - a 
Wikipedia article describing this single character (grapheme) in some detail.  
There are apparently eight Slavic languages using this grapheme.  See the 
Wikipedia article for further elucidation if you are interested.
7.  My curiosity having been thus massively piqued, I explored graphemes and 
writing systems more thoroughly recently, and discovered that not only are 
there over 7,000 different languages today but there is also a huge number of 
radically different writing systems, some of which have no graphemes at all 
that even faintly resemble our Latin-, Greek-, or Cyrillic-derived alphabets of 
today.  I'm talking really weird squiggles.

I have found Google to be an extremely effective replacement for posting 
non-mainframe-centric questions on IBM-MAIN.  I get the answer much more 
quickly, it doesn't expand Darren's archives data base, and I don't bother 
thousands of fellow mainframers who are not very interested in the same arcana 
in which I am (graphemes, inter alia).  I only stumbled upon using Google 
instead of IBM-MAIN when I once asked IBM-MAIN what a commonly used 
cyber-abbreviation meant (IMHO, it might have been IMHO, but only IIRC).  This 
falls into the category of doing one's homework before asking other people for 
help.

Bill Fairchild

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Michael McCawley
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 4:34 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Lacunć

So far as the character source language for "ć", if intended, it would appear 
to be Slavic (Polish or Serbo-Croatian?) in origin, though seldom (never?) used 
as an ending consonant.

http://www.unilang.org/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=23605

Enjoy

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2012 3:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: OT: Lacunć

On Jan 8, 2012, at 14:19, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
> But a day or two ago, I encountered the surprising word "lacunć" in
> his comment on programming languages and their apologists:
>

IIRC, he may have said "lacunæ" and some mail agent corrupted it.

First, be sure you haven't disabled MIME headers in your subscription to 
ASSEMBLER-LIST.

-- gil

Reply via email to