On 4/14/2013 8:26 AM, John Gilmore wrote:
Mr Perryman saw fit to convert a technical disagreement into a personal one. I have no wish contribute to this second discussion except to note that ad hominem arguments are the usual resort of those who have no substantive ones to make.
Unfortunately your "technical disagreements" tend to be worded in such a snide and supercilious fashion that the majority of readers here take them as ad hominem attacks. Gerhard Postpischil Bradford, Vermont
