On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 11:22 AM, Gerhard Postpischil <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 4/14/2013 8:26 AM, John Gilmore wrote: > >> Mr Perryman saw fit to convert a technical disagreement into a >> personal one. I have no wish contribute to this second discussion >> except to note that ad hominem arguments are the usual resort of those >> who have no substantive ones to make. >> > > Unfortunately your "technical disagreements" tend to be worded in such a > snide and supercilious fashion that the majority of readers here take > them as ad hominem attacks. Agreed. It is interesting to note that Gilmore seems to be the only person on the list to which supposed ad hominem attacks are directed. Perhaps he is missing the point that it is his high-and-mighty, holier-than-thou style of communication to which these attack are actually directed. In which case, they are not really ad hominen because a plain reading of his words are self-evident to the everyman on this list as uppity. Sam > > Gerhard Postpischil > Bradford, Vermont >
