On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 7:35 AM, Martin Truebner <[email protected]> wrote:
> John, > > thin ice- very thin ice: > > >> ... and doesn't reference the DUCT because that is a z/OS "thingie". > > Since when? > > Dispatchable Unit control table is something HW related and > documented in PoPs > > and > > the DUCT is only part of the translation process > if a certain bit in the access-register is on otherwise DUCT is not > used. > Mea culpa. I guess that I missed it when I did a fast scan of the PoPS, so I ASSuMEd that it as a z/OS thing. > > Martin > > > -- I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it. Maranatha! <>< John McKown
