Who thought up the name IGDZILLA?

Maybe the same people who thought up $DILBERT and $DOGBERT?

Although I doubt JES2 talks to SMS very often.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:[email protected]] Im 
Auftrag von Seymour J Metz
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. August 2018 20:53
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: IEATDUMP MF=L Can someone explain this?

I hate censorware. Scunthorpe would pass muster in California either.

The prefix IEA goes all the way back to OS/360; it's Supervisor. The T, of 
course, is Transaction.

Who thought up the name IGDZILLA?


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf 
of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2018 5:26 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: IEATDUMP MF=L Can someone explain this?

On 2018-08-25, at 14:27:44, Charles Mills wrote:

> +2
>
> Labels belong in column 1 where your eye can scan for them.
>
Who thinks up these macro names, anyway?  That one wouldn't pass muster
as a California vanity license plate.

> It's great that the new MF=L macros do not require initialization but is
> "which ones" documented anywhere? I tend to use a "model" scheme for
> initializing the DSECT with the MF=L's that works well for me, so I always
> use it.
>
I once tried to define a prototype with DCs; move it into obtained storage
for reentrancy, then map it with dependent USINGs.  No luck; got ambiguous
resolution.  Would have worked if dependent USING allowed for a lower bound
as well as an upper bound.  (64-bit is a greater challenge.)

-- gil

Reply via email to