On 2018-08-26, at 19:22:54, Peter Relson wrote: > Coding a CSECT for the MF=L "model" is, as Gil has pointed out, basically > not helpful for those macros that begin by zeroing the entire area, which > I don't recall saying that. Perhaps credit Ed Jaffe?
> in turn will be those macros that support no keywords on the list form > other than PLISTVER. I'd also suggest that anyone doing a unique getmain > for storage for a parameter parameter area ought to re-investigate their > approach. If your module already has a getmain for dynamic storage, then > include the list form into that area. Consider using the same list area > for multiple services (making sure that you have allotted the maximum that > any of them could need) > Aha! A tour de force in ORG! > if the services cannot be used concurrently ... > We always like to hear your opinions. However, the "label" case is is one > where nothing will change. Perhaps if this had been brought up 30 years > ago, it might have been different, ... > Bummer. Making the List and Execute forms homologous is similar to the design motive of declarators in C. And that comparison alone may be enough to alienate staunch assembler partisans. -- gil
