"IBM Mainframe Assembler List" <[email protected]> wrote on
11/30/2023 11:27:09 AM:
> You don't have to. Static areas and code can share a cache line with
> no performance penalty. It's dynamic areas (and dynamic code) that
> should be isolated from static areas and static code.
Perhaps I should clarify then... My "static" areas are statically
allocated -- not, necessarily, that they will not be modified. So, is
there a way to force a 256-byte boundary between my static data allocation
my static code allocation?
Sincerely,
Dave Clark
--
int.ext: 91078
direct: (937) 531-6378
home: (937) 751-3300
Winsupply Group Services
3110 Kettering Boulevard
Dayton, Ohio 45439 USA
(937) 294-5331
*********************************************************************************************
This email message and any attachments is for use only by the named
addressee(s) and may contain confidential, privileged and/or proprietary
information. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately notify the sender and delete and destroy the message and all
copies. All unauthorized direct or indirect use or disclosure of this
message is strictly prohibited. No right to confidentiality or privilege
is waived or lost by any error in transmission.
*********************************************************************************************
