With 2.0.1 and 2.0.2 (dev) out, I think it might make some sense to distringuish between the two a bit more so that the unknowing user doesn't mistakenly install a dev version.
Previously we had RC in the version numbers didn't we? How about puting "DEV" in the development version? Also, we've got crazy numbering now. 2.0.2 0.0.03 is a lot to process visually. How about something like this: 2.0.2 DEV Build 15 and for the public release 2.0.1 release 15 Then you could just increment the build number when changes are made. No looking and trying to figure out if 2.0.2 0.0.03 is newer or older than 2.0.2 0.1.01 and whow that's different from 2.0.1 1.0.03 I just see numbers. We'd have 2.0.2 DEV Build 15 which is clearly older than 2.0.2 DEV Build 14 and for the public release 2.0.1 Release 15 Make sense? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
