>We think that the 8 digits are needed for our work. Ok, then how about using something a bit easier to interpret visually.
2.0.2 1.00.02 is just too many dots You're used to seeing your version numbers, but can you quickly and easily tell me the order in which these versions were released? 2.7.8 5.15.18 2.8.0 1.01.99 2.7.9 1.02.98 2.8.0 0.02.15 2.7.7 9.99.99 2.8.0 0.30.11 Sure, it's doable like that, I just think that it's easier to see it like this: 2.7.8 51518 2.8.0 10199 2.7.9 10298 2.8.0 00215 2.7.7 99999 2.8.0 03011 especially when the first x.x.x is the same during the development process: 2.8.0 03512 2.8.0 05215 2.8.0 05115 Isn't that easier for you to see? 2.0.2 10002 is much easier to read IMHO. 2.0.2 is the base version with 10002 essentially being the build. Then when we're talking builds in this disucssion list, we could just say 10002 and it's clear what we're talking about. I'd still like to see devel or public listed, but if that's not possible, so be it. 2.0.2 10002 dev vs 2.0.1 10002 pub It looks like assp.pl is already hard coded whether it's devel or not, in determining which cvs to grab updates with. Why not just have it set dev/pub there and display it in the console. And, it shouldn't be hard for you to list dev/pub on sourceforge. That's what I think. Thanks for everything. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
