> 1.0.2b12 for example, is pretty simple to tell that it is a beta 12 release. > To convert that to ASSP style versioning, I think it would be 1.0.2.0.1.0.12 > though I am pretty sure I got that wrong.
I read 1.0.2b12 as v1.0.2 BUILD 12, not beta, so I guess it's still not 100% clear. I've never heard of odd and even being public vs. devel. If that's what we're going to keep using, we should probably make that more clear somewhere. I've been using ASSP since before v1.0 and had no idea that this was the case. If characters in the version number doesn't work for the update system, why not standardize with fewer numbers and then have a devel flag that's true or false? Of course none of this is nearly as important has having ASSP do what it already does so well, blocking spam... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
