On 2010-03-13 10:30 AM, K Post wrote: > We'd have > 2.0.2 DEV Build 15 which is clearly older than > 2.0.2 DEV Build 14 and for the public release > 2.0.1 Release 15 > > Make sense?
Not really... I hate text in version numbers. Since even are dev versions and odd are release versions, why not just make the version 4 digits, with the last digit the 'build' number? So, above just becomes: 2.0.2.15 - which is clearly newer than 2.0.2.14 - and 2.0.1.15 - for the public release ASSP's version numbering has *always* given me a headache. -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
