From what I can tell (and I may be very wrong):

DoPenalty=1 will use scoring to determine whether or not to add ips to 
the penalty box and deny smtp connections
DoPenalty=3 will enable scoring, but not deny connections based on that 
score. It would only be useful with DoPenaltyMessage set to 1

Personally, I go with DoPenalty at 1, and DoPenaltyMessage at 1. That 
way I can do my individual message scoring, but still stop a highly 
misbehaving server when it scores high enough (PenaltyLimit, PenaltyExtreme)

David

Graziano wrote:
> Anyone has an answer to my questions below ?
> Thanks
>   
>> Hello
>>
>> suppose I set
>>
>> DoPenalty to 3
>> and
>> DoPenaltyMessage to 1
>>
>> What will happen exactly to PB (DoPenalty) since I cannot see something 
>> to assign a score value to PB .
>> In which way PB scoring will contribute ?
>> extreme PB and denySMTPConnectionsFrom does work with DoPenalty to 3 ?
>>
>> Thanks!
>> Graziano
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Daniel L. Miller wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Kevin wrote:
>>>>   
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>>>> Though this log "Sender address rejected: unverified address" is 
>>>>>>> suspicious. (read: possible cause)
>>>>>>>         
>>>>>>>           
>>>>>>>             
>>>>>>>               
>>> This is part of a thread I have on the Postfix list on this issue.
>>>
>>>     Wietse-
>>>
>>> The RCPT TO command was rejected with "503 5.5.1 Error: nested MAIL 
>>> command".
>>>
>>>     Me-
>>>
>>> Because ASSP exists as a perl script, it's easy to search the code.  
>>> assp.pl has neither "nested", nor "unverified", nor "5.5.1" contained in 
>>> it - anywhere.
>>>
>>>     Victor-
>>> This does not make it innocent. Postfix returns this error when two "MAIL
>>> FROM:" commands are sent on the same connection without an intervening
>>> "." or "RSET". Don't blame the messenger though, the problem is with the
>>> proxy sending the second "MAIL FROM".
>>>
>>>     Me-
>>> Is it possible that the reject came from my (obviously incorrectly 
>>> configured) Postfix?
>>>
>>>     Victor-
>>> No, this is built-in, and is correct, the problem is incorrect behaviour
>>> (under some conditions) in ASSP.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-user mailing list
>> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to