"ObiWan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schreibt: > >Hmm... I see your point and I may agree, although this means to some >users that the machine sitting behind ASSP should still be exposed to >the "wild internet" and MUST have a working AV scanning in place :-)
That does not necessary mean it. The best solution is a mailserver which can be configured to accept authenticated and trusted IP only. The only trusted IP would be ASSP. I do not understand why you need an additional AV scanning in place. The user submit their messages to the mailserver which routes *all* messages through ASSP to a SMTP-Relay. Messages for local domains are routed back to the mailserver, messages for remote domains are going out to the internet. >I agree about the fact that ASSP wasn't designed for "ISP level mail >filtering" (due to its single-threaded architecture) but if you have >some >"road warriors" around and if the server is used for a corporate >network >then letting the users go through ASSP won't be so "wrong" imVHo :) It is wrong and not necessary. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
