On 12/2/2007 Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > The development went on with 1.3.4, 1.3.5 and 1.3.6
Ok, so maybe I'm missing something... The 1.3 series was the first of the new version numbering, where the odd numbers were designated as the stable branch, correct? When you say the DEVELOPMENT went on with 1.3.4/5/6 - wouldn't it be better to make the development series 1.4.x? And 1.3.4 would be a bugfix STABLE release in the 1.3 stable branch? Then, once 1.4.x was ready to go stable, it would become 1.5, and then a new 1.6 dev branch would be started? I'm confused about what is stable and what is development, and how a dev branch transitions to a stable branch... I guess I'll go back and find the thread where you introduce the new versioning... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
