Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 12/2/2007, Kevin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> I think you would agree a well polished version is much better than a 
>> buggy release followed by many point releases.
> 
> Of course...
> 
> Ok, fair enough, but none of this explains these versions:
> 
>  > 1.3.3.5(fb4)
>  > 1.3.5(2)
>  > 1.3.5(11)
>  > 1.3.5(pb3)
>  > 1.3.5(fc5)
>  > 1.3.5(3.1)
>  > 1.3.5(4.0)
> 

People complained when we don't change the version numbers.
People complained when we do change the version numbers.

I swear there is just no pleasing you people! :)
<that was sarcasm for those of you who missed that>

It's completely up to Fritz to choose how he versions ASSP.

For the record there are some "pre-Fritz" version numbers that would 
make you cringe.

Kevin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
from Novell.  From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going
mainstream.  Let it simplify your IT future.
http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to