Charles Marcus wrote: > On 12/2/2007 Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >> The development went on with 1.3.4, 1.3.5 and 1.3.6 > > Ok, so maybe I'm missing something... > > The 1.3 series was the first of the new version numbering, where the odd > numbers were designated as the stable branch, correct? > > When you say the DEVELOPMENT went on with 1.3.4/5/6 - wouldn't it be > better to make the development series 1.4.x? And 1.3.4 would be a bugfix > STABLE release in the 1.3 stable branch? Then, once 1.4.x was ready to > go stable, it would become 1.5, and then a new 1.6 dev branch would be > started? > > I'm confused about what is stable and what is development, and how a dev > branch transitions to a stable branch... > > I guess I'll go back and find the thread where you introduce the new > versioning...
Go take a look at how the Linux kernel version numbers are done, we follow something close to that. Here's the easy way to tell for ASSP though. If it ends in an odd number it's a stable release. If it ends in an even number it's a dev release. The current *official* stable release is 1.3.3.8 right now. That's version 1.3.3 point release 8. Kevin ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
