Charles Marcus wrote: > On 4/3/2009 4:18 PM, Jeroen van Aart wrote: >>> complain about not being able to connect because their formerly >>> irresponsible but now-finally-getting-on-board ISP started blocking >>> outbound port 25. > >> I don't think blocking port 25 is irresponsible per se. > > Read it again... I said it was IRresponsible to NOT block port 25.
Yes, typo, I meant to say "I don't think allowing port 25 is irresponsible per se". > Obviously my above doesn't apply to someone paying for commercial > service and hosting their own servers... but it would also be Though my static IP is from a "consumer level" internet connection I do expect that if I pay extra for a static IP I should be able to use it what it's meant for. i.e. running certain services such as email and websites, of course with "consumer level" bandwidth usage. > irresponsible for your ISP to not perform some kind of monitoring to > make sure you're not spewing spam in violation of their tos... Of course any ISP worth its salt should do such monitoring. Greetings, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
