GrayHat <[email protected]> schreibt:
>Fritz, but since the OP wrote that the flow
>isn't the one you described, I asked for further details and some
>"message tracking" to understand the "route" taken by the email
I thought the route is shown by the headers:?
Received: from mx1.ugplus.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by smtp.kruger.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E30F2A2B88
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:59:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mx1.domain.tld ([80.72.?.?] helo=mx1.domain.tld) by
assp.kruger.nu; 24 Nov 2009 11:59:18 +0100
Received: from mx2.domain.tld (spam.domain.tld [192.168.46.1])
by mx1.domain.tld (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBA47F2C
for <[email protected]>; Tue, 24 Nov 2009 11:59:17 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MX2.domain.tld ([fe80::41e4:ebe4:...:...]) by
mx2.domain.tld
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
