Chris Franklin wrote: > Not really "down" time, more like limited access as it was has so
It is down time no matter which way you look at it, and last year's event around Sept. was very bad. > only has been loss of access to emails though the web interface. They > have not suffered 1 complete loss of access to users data since It depends on the user, your location and what services you are using. You can't make such a broad claim. If a user only uses imap and can't access email through imap then that is a complete loss of access. Regardless if only she or he is affected or half the world. > starting up this whole venture. Which is allot more then I can say for > any ones home or business internet connections or farther more for > that matter servers and services running flawlessly. It is very easy to set up and maintain a home server with 99.9% uptime or better for any marginally experienced admin. Mostly by virtue of it being used by only 1 or a few people. With setups the size of google downtime is much more likely to happen, for a specific subset of users. Regards, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
