Thanks. Will try it in a couple minutes! Are there other modules that needs updating for ASSP to work well? I just made sure at least the version ASSP recommends was installed and this is my installation:
Module Name Module Version Module Status Download show module load errors installed / required(recommended) show all loaded modules ASSP_FC 1.05 / 1.05 enabled sourceforge ASSP_SVG 1.03 / 1.03 enabled sourceforge ASSP_WordStem 1.27 / 1.27 enabled sourceforge AsspSelfLoader 2.03 / 2.03 enabled sourceforge Authen::SASL 2.16 / 2.16 enabled CPAN BerkeleyDB 0.51 / 0.42 enabled CPAN BerkeleyDB_DBEngine 5.3 / 4.5 enabled oracle Compress::Zlib 2.069 / 2.069 enabled CPAN Convert::TNEF disabled by Module Setup / 0.17 is disabled in config CPAN DB_File disabled by Module Setup / 1.816 is disabled in config CPAN Digest::MD5 2.55 / 2.54 enabled CPAN Digest::SHA1 2.13 / 2.13 enabled CPAN Email::MIME 1.937 / 1.936 enabled CPAN Email::Send 2.201 / 2.201 enabled CPAN File::ReadBackwards 1.05 / 1.05 enabled CPAN File::Scan::ClamAV 1.93 / 1.93 enabled CPAN IO::Poll 0.09 / 0.07 enabled CPAN IO::Select 1.21 / 1.21 enabled CPAN IO::Socket::INET6 not installed / 2.67 is not detected ( enableINET6 is not set ) CPAN IO::Socket::SSL 2.031 / 2.020 enabled CPAN LWP::Simple 6.15 / 6.13 enabled CPAN MIME::Types 2.13 / 2.11 enabled CPAN Mail::DKIM::Verifier 0.39 / 0.38 enabled CPAN Mail::SPF 2.009 / 2.007 enabled CPAN Mail::SPF::Query 1.999001 / 1.999001 enabled CPAN Mail::SRS disabled by Module Setup / 0.31 is disabled in config CPAN Net::CIDR::Lite 0.21 / 0.21 enabled CPAN Net::DNS 1.06 / 1.03 enabled CPAN Net::IP 1.57 / 1.56 enabled CPAN Net::LDAP 0.65 / 0.65 enabled CPAN Net::SMTP 3.08 / 3.07 enabled CPAN Net::SMTP::SSL 1.02 / 1.01 enabled CPAN Net::SSLeay 1.74 / 1.72 enabled CPAN NetAddr::IP::Lite 1.57 / 1.56 enabled CPAN NetSNMP::agent disabled by Module Setup / 5.05 is disabled in config CPAN OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 1.0.1e-fips / 0.9.8 enabled OpenSSL OpenSSL-lib 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013 1.0.1e-fips / 1.0.1h enabled OpenSSL PerlIO::scalar 0.14_01 / 0.14_01 enabled CPAN Regexp::Optimizer 0.23 / 0.23 enabled CPAN Schedule::Cron 1.01 / 1.01 enabled CPAN Sys::CpuAffinity 1.06 / 1.06 enabled CPAN Sys::MemInfo 0.91 / 0.91 enabled CPAN Sys::Syslog 0.34 / 0.25 enabled CPAN Text::Unidecode 1.27 / 1.27 enabled CPAN Thread::Queue 3.11 / 3.07 enabled CPAN Thread::State 0.09 / 0.09 enabled CPAN Tie::RDBM 0.73 / 0.73 enabled CPAN Time::HiRes 1.9739 / 1.9726 enabled CPAN Unicode::GCString 2013.10 / 2013.10 enabled CPAN threads 2.09 / 2.02 enabled CPAN threads::shared 1.52 / 1.48 enabled ----- Original Message ----- From: Thomas Eckardt [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] To: For Users of ASSP [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:08:54 +0100 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JMEHNLE/Mail-SPF-v2.9.0/CHANGES > > Thomas > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > An: "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:56 > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > I'm using 2.008 while ASSP says "2.007" is required. > Should upgrading to 2.009 fix this issue? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Thomas Eckardt > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] > To: For Users of ASSP > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:49:45 > +0100 > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > >Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > =item B<query_rr_types> > > > > For which RR types to query when looking up and selecting SPF records. > The > > following values are supported: > > > > =over > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_all >> > > > > Both C<TXT> and C<SPF> type RRs. > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_txt >> (default) > > > > C<TXT> type RRs only. > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_spf >> > > > > C<SPF> type RRs only. > > > > =back > > > > For years B<Mail::SPF> has defaulted to looking up both C<SPF> and > C<TXT> > > type > > RRs as recommended by RFC 4408. Experience has shown, however, that a > > significant portion of name servers suffer from serious brain damage > with > > regard to the handling of queries for RR types that are unknown to them, > > > such > > as the C<SPF> RR type. Consequently B<Mail::SPF> now defaults to > looking > > up > > only C<TXT> type RRs. This may be overridden by setting the > > B<query_rr_types> > > option. > > > > See RFC 4408, 3.1.1, for a discussion of the topic, as well as the > > description > > of the L</select_record> method. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Seems your Mail::SPF module is outdated - use 2.009 > > > > ASSP uses the default. > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > > An: "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:27 > > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > I'm stil wondering what's wrong with my DNS servers and ASSP. I > installed > > pdns-recorsor on the same host where ASSP is running and I have > installed > > bind on a second VM. > > I tested those name server and they work as expected but ASSP still has > > troubles with some request. Not always, but A LOT. > > In my maillog.txt I see a lot of these: hotmail.com: Unknown error on > DNS > > 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com' > > > > Sometimes it has the SPF records for hotmail.com, but many times it > > doesn't. If I do "host -t txt hotmail.com 127.0.0.1" it always works. > Same > > for "host -t txt hotmail.com 10.1.1.11". > > > > Here's an example in maillog.txt with SPFDebug enabled: > > > > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> info: found message size announcement: 13.26 kByte > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> Message-Score: added -10 (tlsValencePB) for > > SSL-TLS-connection-OK, total score for this message is now -10 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > for 10.1.1.11 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR ( > > > > mail-db5eur01hn0246.outbound.protection.outlook.com. ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > hotmail.com. IN ANY > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' > type > > 'ANY' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > hotmail.com. IN ANY > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' > type > > 'ANY' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 20981 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: hotmail.com. IN ANY > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 132 IN SOA ( > > > ns1.msft.net. msnhst.microsoft.com. > > 2016070805 ;serial > > 7200 ;refresh > > 900 ;retry > > 2419200 ;expire > > 3600 ;minimum > > ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > ns1.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > ns3.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > ns4.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > ns2.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F434211AA68 > > x.x.x.139:56018 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] [isbounce] x.x.x.139 bounce > > > message detected > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: the > > connection will now be moved in to the Full-Transparent-Proxy mode > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: no (more) > > data readable from x.x.x.139 (connection closed by peer) - Connection > > reset by peer - last command was 'RCPT TO' > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Disconnected: session:7F434211AA68 > x.x.x.139 > > - processing time 0 seconds > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added -2 for > 65.54.190.0 > > in griplist (0.18), total score for this message is now -12 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] > 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] DKIM domain mismatch - > > hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no DKIM-Signature found in mail > header > > (Cache) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 15 > (dkimValencePB) > > for DKIM domain mismatch - hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no > > DKIM-Signature found in mail header, total score for this message is now > 3 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > for 10.1.1.11 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: hotmail.com. IN > > ANY > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > IN > > MX 5 mx1.hotmail.com. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > IN > > A 65.55.77.28 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > IN NS ns4.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > IN NS ns3.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > IN > > MX 5 mx4.hotmail.com. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > IN > > A 65.55.85.12 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > IN NS ns1.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 425 IN > > > TXT ( > > "v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com > > include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25 > > include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com > > include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com ~all" > > ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > IN > > MX 5 mx3.hotmail.com. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > IN > > A 157.55.152.112 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > IN NS ns2.msft.net. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > IN > > A 157.56.172.28 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > IN > > MX 5 mx2.hotmail.com. > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 52169 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN > > TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: _dmarc.hotmail.com. 2125 > IN > > TXT ( > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1" > > ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] > 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip info: domain hotmail.com has published > a > > DMARC record > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip strictspf Regex: strictSPFRe > > '@hotmail.com' > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNSresolver > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] SPF: SPFoverride for domain hotmail.com - > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] spf_result:temperror > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip identity:st...@hotmail.com > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip scope:mfrom > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip spf_record: > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip local_exp:hotmail.com: Unknown error > on > > DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com' > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip received_spf:Received-SPF: temperror > > (hotmail.com: Unknown error on DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com') > > receiver=mx101.snip; identity=mailfrom; > envelope-from="st...@hotmail.com"; > > helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com; client-ip=65.54.190.89 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] SPF: temperror > ip=65.54.190.89 > > mailfrom=st...@hotmail.com helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) > > > for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip DMARC: this mail breakes the DKIM > > policies defined in the DMARC record for domain hotmail.com - there is > no > > DKIM-signature found in this mail for domain hotmail.com > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > for 10.1.1.11 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: > _dmarc.hotmail.com. > > IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: _dmarc.hotmail.com. > > 2125 IN TXT ( > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1" > > ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID > > 54935 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID > > 43820 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > 127.0.0.1 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. 19937 IN TXT ( > > > > "0-0=1|1=MICROSOFT > > > HOSTING|2=7.9|3=7.9|6=0|7=10|8=172544|9=7030|20=bay004-omc2s14.hotmail.com|21=msn.net|22=Y|23=7.1|24=7.2|25=0|40=5.0|41=5.1|43=5.3|44=3.9|45=N|46=19|48=24|50=San > > > > Jose|51=CA|52=95141|53=US|54=-121.895|55=37.3394" > > ) > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 54935 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F4341FFBE08 > > 85.158.211.232:34678 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125 > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [MessageOK] > > 65.54.190.89 <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip message ok [complaint > about > > message from 10 164 74 35] > > > > > > any idea's? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Thomas Eckardt > > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] > > To: For Users of ASSP > > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:52:29 > > +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > >But why is this a temperror? > > > > > > assp was unable to get a qualified result for the query using > Mail::SPF > > - > > > that's all > > > most times this is caused by a DNS timeout > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > > > An: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Datum: 18.07.2016 11:53 > > > Betreff: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of the emails that passed ASSP have headers like this: > > > > > > X-Assp-Received-SPF: temperror ip=217.148.21.174 > > > mailfrom=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com helo=vmta12.addemar.com > > > > > > But why is this a temperror? > > > > > > > > > If I use 'spfquery' command line I get: > > > > > > # spfquery --mail-from rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com -i 217.148.21.174 > -h > > > > > vmta12.addemar.com > > > pass > > > Please see > > > > > > http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=rkvcomm%40stratics.addemar.com&ip=217.148.21.174&receiver=spfquery: > > > > > > > > > 217.148.21.128/25 contains 217.148.21.174 > > > spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com designates > > 217.148.21.174 > > > as permitted sender > > > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com > > > designates 217.148.21.174 as permitted sender) > client-ip=217.148.21.174; > > > > > envelope-from=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com; helo=vmta12.addemar.com; > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > > > traffic > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and > protocols > > > > > are > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for > NetFlow, > > > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > > > planning > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Assp-user mailing list > > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > ******************************************************* > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > > legally > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > > > the > > > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > > known virus in this email! > > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > > traffic > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols > > > are > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > > planning > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Assp-user mailing list > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > ******************************************************* > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > legally > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > the > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > known virus in this email! > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > traffic > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols > are > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > planning > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
