I upgraded to Mail:SPF 2.9.0 as suggested but there's still an issue:

# grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt | wc -l
444

# grep hotmail.com 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i "for SPF pass" | wc -l
258


# grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i hotmail
Jul-19-16 07:45:11 m1-07110-04028 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.99 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: j...@sygmanet.be Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) 
for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 5
Jul-19-16 12:37:51 m1-24670-10746 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.169 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: wimo-5c258bea0eaf...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this 
message is now -6
Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: webmas...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 
(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now -6
Jul-19-16 12:51:11 m1-25471-04061 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.140 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: shop-ticket...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 
(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 10
Jul-19-16 14:08:49 m1-30128-13259 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.90 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 
(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 7
Jul-19-16 17:15:12 m1-41310-11578 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.39 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: gerbera-10a49402d1b3...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this 
message is now -6
Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: sno-4a259f014c48...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this 
message is now -8
Jul-19-16 19:36:37 m1-49796-00753 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.37 
<s...@hotmail.be> to: laurent49-e55784b4d645...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this 
message is now -6
Jul-19-16 19:39:01 m1-49940-06640 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.26 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@sennetshop.be Message-Score: added 5 
(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 9
Jul-19-16 20:15:13 m1-52113-02738 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.160 
<s...@hotmail.be> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 
(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now -6
Jul-19-16 20:50:24 m1-54224-10937 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.224 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: kris...@knuts.be Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) 
for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8
Jul-19-16 23:44:38 m1-64678-08355 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.233 
<s...@hotmail.com> to: paulsenior-ab923b9ade4e...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this 
message is now 8





----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Eckardt
[mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
To: For Users of ASSP
[mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:08:54
+0100
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?


> http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JMEHNLE/Mail-SPF-v2.9.0/CHANGES
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum:  18.07.2016 19:56
> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> 
> 
> 
> I'm using 2.008  while ASSP says "2.007" is required.
> Should upgrading to 2.009 fix this issue?
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Thomas Eckardt
> [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
> To: For Users of ASSP
> [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:49:45
> +0100
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> 
> 
> > >Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > 
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > =item B<query_rr_types>
> > 
> > For which RR types to query when looking up and selecting SPF records. 
> The
> > following values are supported:
> > 
> > =over
> > 
> > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_all >>
> > 
> > Both C<TXT> and C<SPF> type RRs.
> > 
> > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_txt >> (default)
> > 
> > C<TXT> type RRs only.
> > 
> > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_spf >>
> > 
> > C<SPF> type RRs only.
> > 
> > =back
> > 
> > For years B<Mail::SPF> has defaulted to looking up both C<SPF> and 
> C<TXT> 
> > type
> > RRs as recommended by RFC 4408.  Experience has shown, however, that a
> > significant portion of name servers suffer from serious brain damage 
> with
> > regard to the handling of queries for RR types that are unknown to them, 
> 
> > such
> > as the C<SPF> RR type.  Consequently B<Mail::SPF> now defaults to 
> looking 
> > up
> > only C<TXT> type RRs.  This may be overridden by setting the 
> > B<query_rr_types>
> > option.
> > 
> > See RFC 4408, 3.1.1, for a discussion of the topic, as well as the 
> > description
> > of the L</select_record> method.
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > Seems your Mail::SPF module is outdated - use 2.009
> > 
> > ASSP uses the default.
> > 
> > Thomas
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> > An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > Datum:  18.07.2016 19:27
> > Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I'm stil wondering what's wrong with my DNS servers and ASSP. I 
> installed 
> > pdns-recorsor on the same host where ASSP is running and I have 
> installed 
> > bind on a second VM.
> > I tested those name server and they work as expected but ASSP still has 
> > troubles with some request. Not always, but A LOT.
> > In my maillog.txt I see a lot of these: hotmail.com: Unknown error on 
> DNS 
> > 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > 
> > Sometimes it has the SPF records for hotmail.com, but many times it 
> > doesn't. If I do "host -t txt hotmail.com 127.0.0.1" it always works. 
> Same 
> > for "host -t txt hotmail.com 10.1.1.11".
> > 
> > Here's an example in maillog.txt with SPFDebug enabled:
> > 
> > 
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> info: found message size announcement: 13.26 kByte
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> Message-Score: added -10 (tlsValencePB) for 
> > SSL-TLS-connection-OK, total score for this message is now -10
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets 
> > for 10.1.1.11
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: 
> > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa.               IN              PTR
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: 
> > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa.               3600            IN PTR ( 
> > 
> >  mail-db5eur01hn0246.outbound.protection.outlook.com. )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - 
> > hotmail.com.             IN              ANY
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' 
> type 
> > 'ANY' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - 
> > hotmail.com.             IN              ANY
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' 
> type 
> > 'ANY' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 20981
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver 
> > 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: hotmail.com. IN ANY
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 132 IN  SOA  ( 
> 
> > ns1.msft.net. msnhst.microsoft.com.
> >   2016070805             ;serial
> >   7200                           ;refresh
> >   900                            ;retry
> >   2419200                                ;expire
> >   3600                           ;minimum
> >                                  )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN  NS 
> > ns1.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN  NS 
> > ns3.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN  NS 
> > ns4.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN  NS 
> > ns2.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F434211AA68 
> > x.x.x.139:56018 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] [isbounce] x.x.x.139 bounce 
> 
> > message detected
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: the 
> > connection will now be moved in to the Full-Transparent-Proxy mode
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: no (more) 
> > data readable from x.x.x.139 (connection closed by peer) - Connection 
> > reset by peer - last command was 'RCPT TO'
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Disconnected: session:7F434211AA68 
> x.x.x.139 
> > - processing time 0 seconds
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added -2 for 
> 65.54.190.0 
> > in griplist (0.18), total score for this message is now -12
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] 
> 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] DKIM domain mismatch - 
> > hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no DKIM-Signature found in mail 
> header 
> > (Cache)
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 15 
> (dkimValencePB) 
> > for DKIM domain mismatch - hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no 
> > DKIM-Signature found in mail header, total score for this message is now 
> 3
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets 
> > for 10.1.1.11
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: hotmail.com.  IN 
> > ANY
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  1596 
> IN 
> >          MX              5 mx1.hotmail.com.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  3019 
> IN 
> >          A               65.55.77.28
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  86728 
> > IN               NS              ns4.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  86728 
> > IN               NS              ns3.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  1596 
> IN 
> >          MX              5 mx4.hotmail.com.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  3019 
> IN 
> >          A               65.55.85.12
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  86728 
> > IN               NS              ns1.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  425 IN 
>  
> >  TXT             ( 
> >                                  "v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com 
> > include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25 
> > include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com 
> > include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com ~all"
> >                                  )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  1596 
> IN 
> >          MX              5 mx3.hotmail.com.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  3019 
> IN 
> >          A               157.55.152.112
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  86728 
> > IN               NS              ns2.msft.net.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  3019 
> IN 
> >          A               157.56.172.28
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com.  1596 
> IN 
> >          MX              5 mx2.hotmail.com.
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - 
> > _dmarc.hotmail.com.              IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - 
> > _dmarc.hotmail.com.              IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 52169
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver 
> > 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: _dmarc.hotmail.com.  IN 
> > TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: _dmarc.hotmail.com.  2125 
> IN 
> >          TXT             ( 
> >                                  "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; 
> > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
> >                                  )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] 
> 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip info: domain hotmail.com has published 
> a 
> > DMARC record
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip strictspf Regex: strictSPFRe 
> > '@hotmail.com'
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNSresolver
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] SPF: SPFoverride for domain hotmail.com - 
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] spf_result:temperror
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip identity:st...@hotmail.com
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip scope:mfrom
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip spf_record:
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip local_exp:hotmail.com: Unknown error 
> on 
> > DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip received_spf:Received-SPF: temperror 
> > (hotmail.com: Unknown error on DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com') 
> > receiver=mx101.snip; identity=mailfrom; 
> envelope-from="st...@hotmail.com"; 
> > helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com; client-ip=65.54.190.89
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] SPF: temperror 
> ip=65.54.190.89 
> > mailfrom=st...@hotmail.com helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) 
> 
> > for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 
> > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip DMARC: this mail breakes the DKIM 
> > policies defined in the DMARC record for domain hotmail.com - there is 
> no 
> > DKIM-signature found in this mail for domain hotmail.com
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets 
> > for 10.1.1.11
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: 
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> >  IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: _dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> > 2125             IN              TXT             ( 
> >                                  "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; 
> > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
> >                                  )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - 
> > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 
> > 54935
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - 
> > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 
> > 43820
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver 
> > 127.0.0.1
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: 
> > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: 
> > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          19937           IN TXT ( 
> > 
> >                                  "0-0=1|1=MICROSOFT 
> > 
> HOSTING|2=7.9|3=7.9|6=0|7=10|8=172544|9=7030|20=bay004-omc2s14.hotmail.com|21=msn.net|22=Y|23=7.1|24=7.2|25=0|40=5.0|41=5.1|43=5.3|44=3.9|45=N|46=19|48=24|50=San
> > 
> > Jose|51=CA|52=95141|53=US|54=-121.895|55=37.3394"
> >                                  )
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 
> > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 54935
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F4341FFBE08 
> > 85.158.211.232:34678 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [MessageOK] 
> > 65.54.190.89 <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip message ok [complaint 
> about 
> > message from 10 164 74 35]
> > 
> > 
> > any idea's?
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
> > To: For Users of ASSP
> > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:52:29
> > +0100
> > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > 
> > 
> > > >But why is this a temperror?
> > > 
> > > assp was unable to get a qualified result for the query using 
> Mail::SPF 
> > - 
> > > that's all
> > > most times this is caused by a DNS timeout
> > > 
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> > > An:     assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Datum:  18.07.2016 11:53
> > > Betreff:        [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Many of the emails that passed ASSP have headers like this:
> > > 
> > > X-Assp-Received-SPF: temperror ip=217.148.21.174 
> > > mailfrom=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com helo=vmta12.addemar.com
> > > 
> > > But why is this a temperror?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If I use 'spfquery' command line I get:
> > > 
> > > # spfquery --mail-from rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com -i 217.148.21.174 
> -h 
> > 
> > > vmta12.addemar.com
> > > pass
> > > Please see 
> > > 
> > 
> http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=rkvcomm%40stratics.addemar.com&ip=217.148.21.174&receiver=spfquery:
> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > 217.148.21.128/25 contains 217.148.21.174
> > > spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com designates 
> > 217.148.21.174 
> > > as permitted sender
> > > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com 
> > > designates 217.148.21.174 as permitted sender) 
> client-ip=217.148.21.174; 
> > 
> > > envelope-from=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com; helo=vmta12.addemar.com;
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
> > > traffic
> > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and 
> protocols 
> > 
> > > are 
> > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for 
> NetFlow, 
> > 
> > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> > > planning
> > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > *******************************************************
> > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
> > legally 
> > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of 
> 
> > the 
> > > 
> > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
> > > known virus in this email!
> > > *******************************************************
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
> > traffic
> > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols 
> 
> > are 
> > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
> 
> > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> > planning
> > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-user mailing list
> > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > DISCLAIMER:
> > *******************************************************
> > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
> legally 
> > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of 
> the 
> > 
> > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
> > known virus in this email!
> > *******************************************************
> > 
> > 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
> traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols 
> are 
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 
> 
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to