I just had a deeper look in to the code and results.
The problem is, that hotmail.com returns a CNAME as result for the 
question about the selector 1. Mail::DKIM does not query the value 
returned - the CNAME

> set type=txt
> selector1._domainkey.hotmail.com

answer:
selector1._domainkey.hotmail.com        canonical name = 
selector1._domainkey.outbound.protection.outlook.com

selector1._domainkey.outbound.protection.outlook.com    text =

 
"v=DKIM1;k=rsa;p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvWyktrIL8DO/+UGvMbv7cPd/Xogpbs7pgVw8y9ldO6AAMmg8+ij
ENl/c7Fb1MfKM7uG3LMwAr0dVVKyM+mbkoX2k5L7lsROQr0Z9gGSpu7xrnZOa58+/pIhd2Xk/DFPpa5+TKbWodbsSZPRN8z0RY5x59jdzSclXlEyN9mEZdmO
iKTsOP6A7vQxfSya9jg5"
 
"N81dfNNvP7HnWejMMsKyIMrXptxOhIBuEYH67JDe98QgX14oHvGM2Uz53if/SW8MF09rYh9sp4ZsaWLIg6T343JzlbtrsGRGCDJ9JPpxRWZimtz
+Up/BlKzT6sCCrBihb/Bi3pZiEBB4Ui/vruL5RCQIDAQAB;n=2048,1452627113,1468351913"

protection.outlook.com  nameserver = ns2-gtm.glbdns.o365filtering.com
protection.outlook.com  nameserver = ns1-gtm.glbdns.o365filtering.com


Currentyl I don't know if this is a mistake made by assp (which is doing 
the DNS QUERY) or Mail::DKIM.

Thomas







Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
Datum:  20.07.2016 09:47
Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?



Okay. Thanks.

----- Original Message -----
From: Thomas Eckardt
[mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
To: For Users of ASSP
[mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 08:00:42
+0100
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?


> I got the same error for hotmail.com DKIM signatures.
> 
> hotmail.com _domainkey selector 1 is :
> 
> 
> 
"v=DKIM1;k=rsa;p=MIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvWyktrIL8DO/+UGvMbv7cPd/Xogpbs7pgVw8y9ldO6AAMmg8+ij
> 
ENl/c7Fb1MfKM7uG3LMwAr0dVVKyM+mbkoX2k5L7lsROQr0Z9gGSpu7xrnZOa58+/pIhd2Xk/DFPpa5+TKbWodbsSZPRN8z0RY5x59jdzSclXlEyN9mEZdmO
> iKTsOP6A7vQxfSya9jg5"
> 
> 
"N81dfNNvP7HnWejMMsKyIMrXptxOhIBuEYH67JDe98QgX14oHvGM2Uz53if/SW8MF09rYh9sp4ZsaWLIg6T343JzlbtrsGRGCDJ9JPpxRWZimtz
> 
+Up/BlKzT6sCCrBihb/Bi3pZiEBB4Ui/vruL5RCQIDAQAB;n=2048,1452627113,1468351913"
> 
> 
> For what ever reason, Mail::DKIM is unable to fetch() the public key. 
> There is nothing you can do.
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> 
> Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Datum:  20.07.2016 00:35
> Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> 
> 
> 
> It looks like there's a problem with DNS in general but it's not always 
a 
> problem:
> 
> # grep DKIM 16-07-19.maillog.txt|grep @hotmail|grep 'public key: not 
> available'
> 
> Jul-19-16 00:21:04 m1-80462-07675 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.91 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: marleen...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM 
signature 
> invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 08:47:43 m1-10862-06664 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.87 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: bigie...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be [scoring] 
(DKIM 
> signature invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 08:59:43 m1-11582-08285 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.215 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: redac...@sennetmagazine.be [scoring] (DKIM 
> signature invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 09:45:13 m1-14312-02896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.116.39 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: triviaq...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM 
signature 
> invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: webmas...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM 
signature 
> invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 15:58:58 m1-36736-07796 [Worker_5] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.90 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to: 5ce2c51e4689...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
> [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to:  4a259f014c48...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be 
> [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available
> Jul-19-16 19:47:03 m1-50422-00530 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.35 
> <s...@hotmail.com> to:ticket...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature 

> invalid) - public key: not available
> 
>  The DNS servers also seem to work fine for every other services but as 
> you can see, sometimes ASSP is unable to find the public key for 
> hotmail.com ?
> 
> I'm using Net::DNS 1.06. This version is okay, right?
> 
> Regards
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Andy Knuts [mailto:a...@knuts.be]
> To:
> For Users of ASSP [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> Sent: Wed, 20 Jul
> 2016 00:13:16 +0100
> Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> 
> 
> > I upgraded to Mail:SPF 2.9.0 as suggested but there's still an issue:
> > 
> > # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt | wc 
-l
> > 444
> > 
> > # grep hotmail.com 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i "for SPF pass" | wc 
-l
> > 258
> > 
> > 
> > # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep 
-i
> > hotmail
> > Jul-19-16 07:45:11 m1-07110-04028 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.99
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: j...@sygmanet.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 
5
> > Jul-19-16 12:37:51 m1-24670-10746 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.169
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: wimo-5c258bea0eaf...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be
> > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score 
> for
> > this message is now -6
> > Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: webmas...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 

> -6
> > Jul-19-16 12:51:11 m1-25471-04061 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.140
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: shop-ticket...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: 
> added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 

> 10
> > Jul-19-16 14:08:49 m1-30128-13259 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.90
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 
7
> > Jul-19-16 17:15:12 m1-41310-11578 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.39
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: 
> gerbera-10a49402d1b3...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be
> > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score 
> for
> > this message is now -6
> > Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: sno-4a259f014c48...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be
> > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score 
> for
> > this message is now -8
> > Jul-19-16 19:36:37 m1-49796-00753 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.37
> > <s...@hotmail.be> to: 
> laurent49-e55784b4d645...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be
> > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score 
> for
> > this message is now -6
> > Jul-19-16 19:39:01 m1-49940-06640 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.26
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@sennetshop.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 
9
> > Jul-19-16 20:15:13 m1-52113-02738 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.160
> > <s...@hotmail.be> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 

> -6
> > Jul-19-16 20:50:24 m1-54224-10937 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.224
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: kris...@knuts.be Message-Score: added 5
> > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 
8
> > Jul-19-16 23:44:38 m1-64678-08355 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.233
> > <s...@hotmail.com> to: 
> paulsenior-ab923b9ade4e...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be
> > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score 
> for
> > this message is now 8
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
> > To: For Users of ASSP
> > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:08:54
> > +0100
> > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > 
> > 
> > > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JMEHNLE/Mail-SPF-v2.9.0/CHANGES
> > > 
> > > Thomas
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> > > An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > Datum:  18.07.2016 19:56
> > > Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I'm using 2.008  while ASSP says "2.007" is required.
> > > Should upgrading to 2.009 fix this issue?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
> > > To: For Users of ASSP
> > > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:49:45
> > > +0100
> > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > >Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > =item B<query_rr_types>
> > > > 
> > > > For which RR types to query when looking up and selecting SPF 
> records. 
> > > The
> > > > following values are supported:
> > > > 
> > > > =over
> > > > 
> > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_all >>
> > > > 
> > > > Both C<TXT> and C<SPF> type RRs.
> > > > 
> > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_txt >> (default)
> > > > 
> > > > C<TXT> type RRs only.
> > > > 
> > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_spf >>
> > > > 
> > > > C<SPF> type RRs only.
> > > > 
> > > > =back
> > > > 
> > > > For years B<Mail::SPF> has defaulted to looking up both C<SPF> and 

> > > C<TXT> 
> > > > type
> > > > RRs as recommended by RFC 4408.  Experience has shown, however, 
that 
> a
> > > > significant portion of name servers suffer from serious brain 
damage 
> 
> > > with
> > > > regard to the handling of queries for RR types that are unknown to 

> them,
> > 
> > > 
> > > > such
> > > > as the C<SPF> RR type.  Consequently B<Mail::SPF> now defaults to 
> > > looking 
> > > > up
> > > > only C<TXT> type RRs.  This may be overridden by setting the 
> > > > B<query_rr_types>
> > > > option.
> > > > 
> > > > See RFC 4408, 3.1.1, for a discussion of the topic, as well as the 

> > > > description
> > > > of the L</select_record> method.
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Seems your Mail::SPF module is outdated - use 2.009
> > > > 
> > > > ASSP uses the default.
> > > > 
> > > > Thomas
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> > > > An:     "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > > Datum:  18.07.2016 19:27
> > > > Betreff:        Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > I'm stil wondering what's wrong with my DNS servers and ASSP. I 
> > > installed 
> > > > pdns-recorsor on the same host where ASSP is running and I have 
> > > installed 
> > > > bind on a second VM.
> > > > I tested those name server and they work as expected but ASSP 
still 
> has 
> > > > troubles with some request. Not always, but A LOT.
> > > > In my maillog.txt I see a lot of these: hotmail.com: Unknown error 

> on 
> > > DNS 
> > > > 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > > > 
> > > > Sometimes it has the SPF records for hotmail.com, but many times 
it 
> > > > doesn't. If I do "host -t txt hotmail.com 127.0.0.1" it always 
> works. 
> > > Same 
> > > > for "host -t txt hotmail.com 10.1.1.11".
> > > > 
> > > > Here's an example in maillog.txt with SPFDebug enabled:
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> info: found message size announcement: 13.26 
> kByte
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> Message-Score: added -10 (tlsValencePB) for 
> > > > SSL-TLS-connection-OK, total score for this message is now -10
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 
2
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS 
> sockets 
> > > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: 
> > > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa.               IN              PTR
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: 
> > > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa.               3600            IN PTR ( 
> > > > 
> > > >  mail-db5eur01hn0246.outbound.protection.outlook.com. )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 
- 
> 
> > > > hotmail.com.             IN              ANY
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
'hotmail.com' 
> 
> > > type 
> > > > 'ANY' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 
- 
> 
> > > > hotmail.com.             IN              ANY
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
'hotmail.com' 
> 
> > > type 
> > > > 'ANY' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 20981
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 
127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from 
> nameserver 
> > > > 127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: hotmail.com. IN 
ANY
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 132 IN 
SOA 
>  (
> > 
> > > 
> > > > ns1.msft.net. msnhst.microsoft.com.
> > > >   2016070805             ;serial
> > > >   7200                           ;refresh
> > > >   900                            ;retry
> > > >   2419200                                ;expire
> > > >   3600                           ;minimum
> > > >                                  )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN 

> NS 
> > > > ns1.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN 

> NS 
> > > > ns3.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN 

> NS 
> > > > ns4.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN 

> NS 
> > > > ns2.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 

> > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F434211AA68 
> > > > x.x.x.139:56018 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] [isbounce] x.x.x.139 
> bounce
> > 
> > > 
> > > > message detected
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: the 
> > > > connection will now be moved in to the Full-Transparent-Proxy mode
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: no 
> (more) 
> > > > data readable from x.x.x.139 (connection closed by peer) - 
> Connection 
> > > > reset by peer - last command was 'RCPT TO'
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Disconnected: session:7F434211AA68 
> > > x.x.x.139 
> > > > - processing time 0 seconds
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added -2 for 
> > > 65.54.190.0 
> > > > in griplist (0.18), total score for this message is now -12
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] 
> > > 65.54.190.89 
> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] DKIM domain mismatch - 

> > > > hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no DKIM-Signature found in 
mail 
> > > header 
> > > > (Cache)
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 15 
> > > (dkimValencePB) 
> > > > for DKIM domain mismatch - hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no 
> > > > DKIM-Signature found in mail header, total score for this message 
is 
> now
> > 
> > > 3
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 
2
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS 
> sockets 
> > > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: hotmail.com. 

> IN 
> > > > ANY
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 1596 
> > > IN 
> > > >          MX              5 mx1.hotmail.com.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 3019 
> > > IN 
> > > >          A               65.55.77.28
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 86728 
> > > > IN               NS              ns4.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 86728 
> > > > IN               NS              ns3.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 1596 
> > > IN 
> > > >          MX              5 mx4.hotmail.com.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 3019 
> > > IN 
> > > >          A               65.55.85.12
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 86728 
> > > > IN               NS              ns1.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
425 
> IN
> > 
> > > 
> > > >  TXT             ( 
> > > >                                  "v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com 

> > > > include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25 
> > > > include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com 
> > > > include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com 
> ~all"
> > > >                                  )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 1596 
> > > IN 
> > > >          MX              5 mx3.hotmail.com.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 3019 
> > > IN 
> > > >          A               157.55.152.112
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 86728 
> > > > IN               NS              ns2.msft.net.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 3019 
> > > IN 
> > > >          A               157.56.172.28
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 
> 1596 
> > > IN 
> > > >          MX              5 mx2.hotmail.com.
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 
- 
> 
> > > > _dmarc.hotmail.com.              IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 
- 
> 
> > > > _dmarc.hotmail.com.              IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 52169
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 
127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from 
> nameserver 
> > > > 127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: 
_dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> IN 
> > > > TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: _dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> 2125 
> > > IN 
> > > >          TXT             ( 
> > > >                                  "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; 
> > > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
> > > >                                  )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 

> > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] 
> > > 65.54.190.89 
> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip info: domain hotmail.com has 
> published
> > 
> > > a 
> > > > DMARC record
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip strictspf Regex: strictSPFRe 
> > > > '@hotmail.com'
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNSresolver
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] SPF: SPFoverride for domain 
> hotmail.com - 
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: 
> > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] spf_result:temperror
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip identity:st...@hotmail.com
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip scope:mfrom
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip spf_record:
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip local_exp:hotmail.com: Unknown 
> error 
> > > on 
> > > > DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com'
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip received_spf:Received-SPF: 
> temperror 
> > > > (hotmail.com: Unknown error on DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com') 
> > > > receiver=mx101.snip; identity=mailfrom; 
> > > envelope-from="st...@hotmail.com"; 
> > > > helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com; client-ip=65.54.190.89
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] SPF: temperror 
> > > ip=65.54.190.89 
> > > > mailfrom=st...@hotmail.com helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 5 
> (spfeValencePB)
> > 
> > > 
> > > > for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 

> > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip DMARC: this mail breakes the 
DKIM 
> > > > policies defined in the DMARC record for domain hotmail.com - 
there 
> is 
> > > no 
> > > > DKIM-signature found in this mail for domain hotmail.com
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 
2
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS 
> sockets 
> > > > for 10.1.1.11
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: 
> > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> > > >  IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: 
> _dmarc.hotmail.com. 
> > > > 2125             IN              TXT             ( 
> > > >                                  "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; 
> > > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1"
> > > >                                  )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 
- 
> 
> > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 
127.0.0.1 
> ID 
> > > > 54935
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 
- 
> 
> > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 
> > > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 
10.1.1.11 
> ID 
> > > > 43820
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 
127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from 
> nameserver 
> > > > 127.0.0.1
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: 
> > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          IN              TXT
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: 
> > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org.          19937           IN TXT ( 
> > > > 
> > > >                                  "0-0=1|1=MICROSOFT 
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
HOSTING|2=7.9|3=7.9|6=0|7=10|8=172544|9=7030|20=bay004-omc2s14.hotmail.com|21=msn.net|22=Y|23=7.1|24=7.2|25=0|40=5.0|41=5.1|43=5.3|44=3.9|45=N|46=19|48=24|50=San
> > > > 
> > > > Jose|51=CA|52=95141|53=US|54=-121.895|55=37.3394"
> > > >                                  )
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from 

> > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 54935
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F4341FFBE08 
> > > > 85.158.211.232:34678 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125
> > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [MessageOK] 
> > > > 65.54.190.89 <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip message ok 
[complaint 
> 
> > > about 
> > > > message from 10 164 74 35]
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > any idea's?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Thomas Eckardt
> > > > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com]
> > > > To: For Users of ASSP
> > > > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net]
> > > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:52:29
> > > > +0100
> > > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > >But why is this a temperror?
> > > > > 
> > > > > assp was unable to get a qualified result for the query using 
> > > Mail::SPF 
> > > > - 
> > > > > that's all
> > > > > most times this is caused by a DNS timeout
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thomas
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Von:    "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be>
> > > > > An:     assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > Datum:  18.07.2016 11:53
> > > > > Betreff:        [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Many of the emails that passed ASSP have headers like this:
> > > > > 
> > > > > X-Assp-Received-SPF: temperror ip=217.148.21.174 
> > > > > mailfrom=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com helo=vmta12.addemar.com
> > > > > 
> > > > > But why is this a temperror?
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > If I use 'spfquery' command line I get:
> > > > > 
> > > > > # spfquery --mail-from rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com -i 
> 217.148.21.174 
> > > -h 
> > > > 
> > > > > vmta12.addemar.com
> > > > > pass
> > > > > Please see 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=rkvcomm%40stratics.addemar.com&ip=217.148.21.174&receiver=spfquery:

> 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 217.148.21.128/25 contains 217.148.21.174
> > > > > spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com designates 
> > > > 217.148.21.174 
> > > > > as permitted sender
> > > > > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of 
> rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com 
> > > > > designates 217.148.21.174 as permitted sender) 
> > > client-ip=217.148.21.174; 
> > > > 
> > > > > envelope-from=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com; 
> helo=vmta12.addemar.com;
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth 

> and 
> > > > > traffic
> > > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and 
> > > protocols 
> > > > 
> > > > > are 
> > > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for 
> > > NetFlow, 
> > > > 
> > > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using 
> capacity 
> > > > > planning
> > > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > > > *******************************************************
> > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be 
confidential, 
> > > > legally 
> > > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the 
> use of
> > 
> > > 
> > > > the 
> > > > > 
> > > > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should 
be 
> no 
> > > > > known virus in this email!
> > > > > *******************************************************
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth 
and 
> 
> > > > traffic
> > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and 
> protocols
> > 
> > > 
> > > > are 
> > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for 
> NetFlow,
> > 
> > > 
> > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using 
> capacity 
> > > > planning
> > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > > *******************************************************
> > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
> > > legally 
> > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the 
use 
> of 
> > > the 
> > > > 
> > > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be 

> no 
> > > > known virus in this email!
> > > > *******************************************************
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > >
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 

> > > traffic
> > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and 
> protocols 
> > > are 
> > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for 
> NetFlow, 
> > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using 
capacity 
> > > planning
> > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Assp-user mailing list
> > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > DISCLAIMER:
> > > *******************************************************
> > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
> legally 
> > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use 
of 
> the
> > 
> > > 
> > > individual to whom it is addressed.
> > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be 
no 
> > > known virus in this email!
> > > *******************************************************
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
> traffic
> > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and 
protocols 
> are
> > 
> > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for 
NetFlow, 
> 
> > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
> > planning
> > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > Assp-user mailing list
> > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> > 
> 
> 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
> traffic
> patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols 

> are 
> consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 

> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
> planning
> reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> DISCLAIMER:
> *******************************************************
> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, 
legally 
> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of 
the 
> 
> individual to whom it is addressed.
> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
> known virus in this email!
> *******************************************************
> 
> 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and 
traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols 
are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity 
planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user






DISCLAIMER:
*******************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally 
privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the 

individual to whom it is addressed.
This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no 
known virus in this email!
*******************************************************

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic
patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are 
consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, 
J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning
reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to