It looks like there's a problem with DNS in general but it's not always a problem:
# grep DKIM 16-07-19.maillog.txt|grep @hotmail|grep 'public key: not available' Jul-19-16 00:21:04 m1-80462-07675 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.91 <s...@hotmail.com> to: marleen...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 08:47:43 m1-10862-06664 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.87 <s...@hotmail.com> to: bigie...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 08:59:43 m1-11582-08285 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.215 <s...@hotmail.com> to: redac...@sennetmagazine.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 09:45:13 m1-14312-02896 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.116.39 <s...@hotmail.com> to: triviaq...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96 <s...@hotmail.com> to: webmas...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 15:58:58 m1-36736-07796 [Worker_5] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.90 <s...@hotmail.com> to: 5ce2c51e4689...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80 <s...@hotmail.com> to: 4a259f014c48...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available Jul-19-16 19:47:03 m1-50422-00530 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.35 <s...@hotmail.com> to:ticket...@seniorennet.be [scoring] (DKIM signature invalid) - public key: not available The DNS servers also seem to work fine for every other services but as you can see, sometimes ASSP is unable to find the public key for hotmail.com ? I'm using Net::DNS 1.06. This version is okay, right? Regards ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Knuts [mailto:a...@knuts.be] To: For Users of ASSP [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] Sent: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 00:13:16 +0100 Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > I upgraded to Mail:SPF 2.9.0 as suggested but there's still an issue: > > # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt | wc -l > 444 > > # grep hotmail.com 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i "for SPF pass" | wc -l > 258 > > > # grep '(spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror' 16-07-19.maillog.txt |grep -i > hotmail > Jul-19-16 07:45:11 m1-07110-04028 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.99 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: j...@sygmanet.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 5 > Jul-19-16 12:37:51 m1-24670-10746 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.169 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: wimo-5c258bea0eaf...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for > this message is now -6 > Jul-19-16 12:39:49 m1-24788-06927 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.54.51.96 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: webmas...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now -6 > Jul-19-16 12:51:11 m1-25471-04061 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.140 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: shop-ticket...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 10 > Jul-19-16 14:08:49 m1-30128-13259 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.90 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 7 > Jul-19-16 17:15:12 m1-41310-11578 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.90.39 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: gerbera-10a49402d1b3...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for > this message is now -6 > Jul-19-16 17:16:33 m1-41391-04219 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.55.34.80 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: sno-4a259f014c48...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for > this message is now -8 > Jul-19-16 19:36:37 m1-49796-00753 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.37 > <s...@hotmail.be> to: laurent49-e55784b4d645...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for > this message is now -6 > Jul-19-16 19:39:01 m1-49940-06640 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.2.26 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: supp...@sennetshop.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 9 > Jul-19-16 20:15:13 m1-52113-02738 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.1.160 > <s...@hotmail.be> to: supp...@seniorennet.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now -6 > Jul-19-16 20:50:24 m1-54224-10937 [Worker_2] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.224 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: kris...@knuts.be Message-Score: added 5 > (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8 > Jul-19-16 23:44:38 m1-64678-08355 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 157.55.0.233 > <s...@hotmail.com> to: paulsenior-ab923b9ade4e...@mailgroepen.seniorennet.be > Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) for SPF temperror, total score for > this message is now 8 > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Thomas Eckardt > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] > To: For Users of ASSP > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 20:08:54 > +0100 > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > http://cpansearch.perl.org/src/JMEHNLE/Mail-SPF-v2.9.0/CHANGES > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > > An: "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:56 > > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > I'm using 2.008 while ASSP says "2.007" is required. > > Should upgrading to 2.009 fix this issue? > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Thomas Eckardt > > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] > > To: For Users of ASSP > > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 19:49:45 > > +0100 > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > >Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > =item B<query_rr_types> > > > > > > For which RR types to query when looking up and selecting SPF records. > > The > > > following values are supported: > > > > > > =over > > > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_all >> > > > > > > Both C<TXT> and C<SPF> type RRs. > > > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_txt >> (default) > > > > > > C<TXT> type RRs only. > > > > > > =item B<< Mail::SPF::Server->query_rr_type_spf >> > > > > > > C<SPF> type RRs only. > > > > > > =back > > > > > > For years B<Mail::SPF> has defaulted to looking up both C<SPF> and > > C<TXT> > > > type > > > RRs as recommended by RFC 4408. Experience has shown, however, that a > > > significant portion of name servers suffer from serious brain damage > > with > > > regard to the handling of queries for RR types that are unknown to them, > > > > > > such > > > as the C<SPF> RR type. Consequently B<Mail::SPF> now defaults to > > looking > > > up > > > only C<TXT> type RRs. This may be overridden by setting the > > > B<query_rr_types> > > > option. > > > > > > See RFC 4408, 3.1.1, for a discussion of the topic, as well as the > > > description > > > of the L</select_record> method. > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > Seems your Mail::SPF module is outdated - use 2.009 > > > > > > ASSP uses the default. > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > > > An: "For Users of ASSP" <assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net> > > > Datum: 18.07.2016 19:27 > > > Betreff: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm stil wondering what's wrong with my DNS servers and ASSP. I > > installed > > > pdns-recorsor on the same host where ASSP is running and I have > > installed > > > bind on a second VM. > > > I tested those name server and they work as expected but ASSP still has > > > troubles with some request. Not always, but A LOT. > > > In my maillog.txt I see a lot of these: hotmail.com: Unknown error on > > DNS > > > 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com' > > > > > > Sometimes it has the SPF records for hotmail.com, but many times it > > > doesn't. If I do "host -t txt hotmail.com 127.0.0.1" it always works. > > Same > > > for "host -t txt hotmail.com 10.1.1.11". > > > > > > Here's an example in maillog.txt with SPFDebug enabled: > > > > > > > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> info: found message size announcement: 13.26 kByte > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> Message-Score: added -10 (tlsValencePB) for > > > SSL-TLS-connection-OK, total score for this message is now -10 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > > for 10.1.1.11 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: > > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: > > > 246.2.47.104.in-addr.arpa. 3600 IN PTR ( > > > > > > mail-db5eur01hn0246.outbound.protection.outlook.com. ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > > hotmail.com. IN ANY > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' > > type > > > 'ANY' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > > hotmail.com. IN ANY > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for 'hotmail.com' > > type > > > 'ANY' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 20981 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > > 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: hotmail.com. IN ANY > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 132 IN SOA ( > > > > > > ns1.msft.net. msnhst.microsoft.com. > > > 2016070805 ;serial > > > 7200 ;refresh > > > 900 ;retry > > > 2419200 ;expire > > > 3600 ;minimum > > > ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > > ns1.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > > ns3.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > > ns4.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: hotmail.com. 76269 IN NS > > > ns2.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 15404 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F434211AA68 > > > x.x.x.139:56018 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] [isbounce] x.x.x.139 bounce > > > > > > message detected > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: the > > > connection will now be moved in to the Full-Transparent-Proxy mode > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 m1-61468-09511 [Worker_2] x.x.x.139 info: no (more) > > > data readable from x.x.x.139 (connection closed by peer) - Connection > > > reset by peer - last command was 'RCPT TO' > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:28 [Worker_2] Disconnected: session:7F434211AA68 > > x.x.x.139 > > > - processing time 0 seconds > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added -2 for > > 65.54.190.0 > > > in griplist (0.18), total score for this message is now -12 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] > > 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] DKIM domain mismatch - > > > hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no DKIM-Signature found in mail > > header > > > (Cache) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 15 > > (dkimValencePB) > > > for DKIM domain mismatch - hotmail.com found in DKIMCache, but no > > > DKIM-Signature found in mail header, total score for this message is now > > > 3 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > > for 10.1.1.11 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: hotmail.com. IN > > > ANY > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > > IN > > > MX 5 mx1.hotmail.com. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > > IN > > > A 65.55.77.28 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > > IN NS ns4.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > > IN NS ns3.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > > IN > > > MX 5 mx4.hotmail.com. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > > IN > > > A 65.55.85.12 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > > IN NS ns1.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 425 IN > > > > > > TXT ( > > > "v=spf1 include:spf-a.outlook.com > > > include:spf-b.outlook.com ip4:157.55.9.128/25 > > > include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf-a.hotmail.com > > > include:_spf-ssg-b.microsoft.com include:_spf-ssg-c.microsoft.com ~all" > > > ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > > IN > > > MX 5 mx3.hotmail.com. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > > IN > > > A 157.55.152.112 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 86728 > > > IN NS ns2.msft.net. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 3019 > > IN > > > A 157.56.172.28 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: hotmail.com. 1596 > > IN > > > MX 5 mx2.hotmail.com. > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > > '_dmarc.hotmail.com' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID 52169 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > > 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: _dmarc.hotmail.com. IN > > > TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: _dmarc.hotmail.com. 2125 > > IN > > > TXT ( > > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; > > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1" > > > ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 21607 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [DKIM] > > 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip info: domain hotmail.com has published > > > a > > > DMARC record > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip strictspf Regex: strictSPFRe > > > '@hotmail.com' > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNSresolver > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] SPF: SPFoverride for domain hotmail.com - > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com SPF > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNSResolverSend: caller: > > > Mail::SPF::Server, 564, hotmail.com TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] spf_result:temperror > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip identity:st...@hotmail.com > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip scope:mfrom > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip spf_record: > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip local_exp:hotmail.com: Unknown error > > on > > > DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com' > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip received_spf:Received-SPF: temperror > > > (hotmail.com: Unknown error on DNS 'SPF' lookup of 'hotmail.com') > > > receiver=mx101.snip; identity=mailfrom; > > envelope-from="st...@hotmail.com"; > > > helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com; client-ip=65.54.190.89 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip [scoring] SPF: temperror > > ip=65.54.190.89 > > > mailfrom=st...@hotmail.com helo=BAY004-OMC2S14.hotmail.com > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip Message-Score: added 5 (spfeValencePB) > > > > > > for SPF temperror, total score for this message is now 8 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] 65.54.190.89 > > > <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip DMARC: this mail breakes the DKIM > > > policies defined in the DMARC record for domain hotmail.com - there is > > no > > > DKIM-signature found in this mail for domain hotmail.com > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanup existing DNS sockets - 2 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: cleanedup old data from DNS sockets > > > for 10.1.1.11 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-question: > > _dmarc.hotmail.com. > > > IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Cleanedup DNS-answer: _dmarc.hotmail.com. > > > 2125 IN TXT ( > > > "v=DMARC1; p=none; pct=100; > > > rua=mailto:d...@rua.agari.com; ruf=mailto:d...@ruf.agari.com; fo=1" > > > ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 127.0.0.1 - > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID > > > 54935 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: reuse DNS socket for 10.1.1.11 - > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: sent DNS query for > > > '89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org' type 'TXT' to nameserver 10.1.1.11 ID > > > 43820 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: DNS query time 0.000 - 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got DNS DATA answer from nameserver > > > 127.0.0.1 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-question was: > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. IN TXT > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] DNS-answer is: > > > 89.190.54.65.sa.senderbase.org. 19937 IN TXT ( > > > > > > "0-0=1|1=MICROSOFT > > > > > > HOSTING|2=7.9|3=7.9|6=0|7=10|8=172544|9=7030|20=bay004-omc2s14.hotmail.com|21=msn.net|22=Y|23=7.1|24=7.2|25=0|40=5.0|41=5.1|43=5.3|44=3.9|45=N|46=19|48=24|50=San > > > > > > Jose|51=CA|52=95141|53=US|54=-121.895|55=37.3394" > > > ) > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_1] Info: got valid DNS DATA answer from > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 ID 54935 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 [Worker_2] Connected: session:7F4341FFBE08 > > > 85.158.211.232:34678 > x.x.x.234:25 > 127.0.0.1:125 > > > Jul-18-16 19:04:29 m1-61468-07595 [Worker_1] [TLS-in] [MessageOK] > > > 65.54.190.89 <st...@hotmail.com> to: JMRP@snip message ok [complaint > > about > > > message from 10 164 74 35] > > > > > > > > > any idea's? > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Thomas Eckardt > > > [mailto:thomas.ecka...@thockar.com] > > > To: For Users of ASSP > > > [mailto:assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net] > > > Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2016 12:52:29 > > > +0100 > > > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > > > >But why is this a temperror? > > > > > > > > assp was unable to get a qualified result for the query using > > Mail::SPF > > > - > > > > that's all > > > > most times this is caused by a DNS timeout > > > > > > > > Thomas > > > > > > > > > > > > Von: "Andy Knuts" <a...@knuts.be> > > > > An: assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > Datum: 18.07.2016 11:53 > > > > Betreff: [Assp-user] SPF_temperror,_why? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Many of the emails that passed ASSP have headers like this: > > > > > > > > X-Assp-Received-SPF: temperror ip=217.148.21.174 > > > > mailfrom=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com helo=vmta12.addemar.com > > > > > > > > But why is this a temperror? > > > > > > > > > > > > If I use 'spfquery' command line I get: > > > > > > > > # spfquery --mail-from rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com -i 217.148.21.174 > > -h > > > > > > > vmta12.addemar.com > > > > pass > > > > Please see > > > > > > > > > > http://www.openspf.org/why.html?sender=rkvcomm%40stratics.addemar.com&ip=217.148.21.174&receiver=spfquery: > > > > > > > > > > > > > 217.148.21.128/25 contains 217.148.21.174 > > > > spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com designates > > > 217.148.21.174 > > > > as permitted sender > > > > Received-SPF: pass (spfquery: domain of rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com > > > > designates 217.148.21.174 as permitted sender) > > client-ip=217.148.21.174; > > > > > > > envelope-from=rkvc...@stratics.addemar.com; helo=vmta12.addemar.com; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > > > > traffic > > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and > > protocols > > > > > > > are > > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for > > NetFlow, > > > > > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > > > > planning > > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Assp-user mailing list > > > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > > ******************************************************* > > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > > > legally > > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > > > > > > the > > > > > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > > > known virus in this email! > > > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > > > traffic > > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols > > > > > > are > > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > > > > > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > > > planning > > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Assp-user mailing list > > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > > ******************************************************* > > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, > > legally > > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of > > the > > > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > > known virus in this email! > > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and > > traffic > > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols > > are > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > > planning > > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Assp-user mailing list > > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: > > ******************************************************* > > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > > > > individual to whom it is addressed. > > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > > known virus in this email! > > ******************************************************* > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic > patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are > > consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, > J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity > planning > reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What NetFlow Analyzer can do for you? Monitors network bandwidth and traffic patterns at an interface-level. Reveals which users, apps, and protocols are consuming the most bandwidth. Provides multi-vendor support for NetFlow, J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity planning reports.http://sdm.link/zohodev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list Assp-user@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
