On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:16:15 +0200 Cedric Blancher wrote: > On 29 August 2012 15:13, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote: > > > > one example of intercepting/renaming syscalls is <ast.h> already, and for a > > while, > > translates all foo() syscalls to foo64() where foo64() is avaliable
> I know, but you do that with #define like Olga's proposal. Adding more > functions sounds bad since a lot of platforms have a hefty penalty for > function calls with more than two arguments. we're talking about syscalls that do pathname resolution how hefty is function call overhead vs. syscall context switch and pathname resolution _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers