On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:24:45 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote: > On 9 October 2012 18:01, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:46:21 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?= > > wrote: > >> Glenn, which hexadecimal code is ^M again, is it 0x0D? > > > >> cat Downloads/Mamfile | od -t x1 | fgrep -i 0d | wc -l > >> 920 > >> cat Downloads/Mamfile | od -t x1 | fgrep -i 0a | wc -l > >> 919 > > > >> Can you resend the file, with bzip2 compression, to prevent mail apps > >> from mangling text files, please? > > > > if you use od -c ^M will display as \r > > > > I'll post another alpha this afternoon > > we're wasting too much time on workarounds
> Right. Are you going to release the new alpha this week? yes, dgk found the builtin tail regression we're tracking down one more bug in the new ast spawnvex() wrapper for { fork() vfork() posix_spawn() spawn() spawnve() etc. } we're hoping to limit all of the iffe-like choices w.r.t spawn in spawnvex() > Lionel _______________________________________________ ast-developers mailing list ast-developers@research.att.com https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers