On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 19:24:45 +0200 Lionel Cons wrote:
> On 9 October 2012 18:01, Glenn Fowler <g...@research.att.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 9 Oct 2012 17:46:21 +0200 =?KOI8-R?B?z8zYx8Egy9LZ1sHOz9fTy8HR?=
> > wrote:
> >> Glenn, which hexadecimal code is ^M again, is it 0x0D?
> >
> >> cat Downloads/Mamfile | od -t x1 | fgrep -i 0d | wc -l
> >> 920
> >> cat Downloads/Mamfile | od -t x1 | fgrep -i 0a | wc -l
> >> 919
> >
> >> Can you resend the file, with bzip2 compression, to prevent mail apps
> >> from mangling text files, please?
> >
> > if you use od -c ^M will display as \r
> >
> > I'll post another alpha this afternoon
> > we're wasting too much time on workarounds
> Right. Are you going to release the new alpha this week?
yes, dgk found the builtin tail regression
we're tracking down one more bug in the new ast spawnvex() wrapper for
{ fork() vfork() posix_spawn() spawn() spawnve() etc. }
we're hoping to limit all of the iffe-like choices w.r.t spawn in spawnvex()
> Lionel
_______________________________________________
ast-developers mailing list
ast-developers@research.att.com
https://mailman.research.att.com/mailman/listinfo/ast-developers
