--- On Fri, 5/9/08, Peter Beckman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I wonder if the interlata and intralata rates are based on > ANI or CLID.
There is absolutely no way to tell the "real" ANI with calls pushed through SIP, so my experience has been that we've been billed using the CID solely. (what ANI is sent I have no idea) > I could really save some money terminating calls if I could > set the ANI as within a LATA, but the CLID a completely different > value. I'm sure this is considered "FRAUD" but given no regulations, > hey, use it until it's no longer allowed. I'm sure some out there are doing exactly that. (set the CID to something which would yield lower rates) I wouldn't call it fraud though. When you think about it interconnection rates and reciprocal revenue and all that were meant for the PSTN. You can't treat a call coming to you via your owned PSTN wiring and a call coming to you via someone else's (internet) backbone as the same for billing purposes. Can't being "shouldn't". ;) -- Nitzan _______________________________________________ --Bandwidth and Colocation Provided by http://www.api-digital.com-- asterisk-biz mailing list To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-biz
