On Fri, 2003-11-07 at 16:04, Olle E. Johansson wrote: > Steven Critchfield wrote: > > >>We have to rename "Zaptel timing" to "Asterisk timer", which is more correct > >>since there are several ways of getting a timer to work, only one of them > >>is by using Zaptel cards. > >> > >>http://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk+timer > > > > > > Actually it needs to be zapata timing. The other drivers just make a > > zapata compatible timing source that asterisk can use. > > Is the zapata timer superior to the ztdummy and ztrtc drivers, or are > they, from an Asterisk point of view, compatible?
>From asterisk point of view they should be equivalent. The point is these all are a class of drivers providing similar functionality. The X100P, T100P, T400P, TE410P, S100U and such are zapata devices that provide timing and channel access. ztdummy and ztrtc don't provide a full zapata device only because they don't make a telephony interface, but the implement the timing needed for asterisk. -- Steven Critchfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
