Bradley D. Thornton wrote:
<snip>
i don't need nats, nat traversal, nat anything.  if i did, iax
might well be one of the technologies i would consider.  but i
don't.


<snip>

  Watch out for this man Bush! He is a professional espionage troll
  and hides his agent status behind his condescending facade.

  What do you want Randy? Go back to Admiralty way with all your
  ICANNite cronies if you're not going to behave here!


I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed.


http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf

Can anyone give me a quick rundown on why there's such discontent for this person

-Adam
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
  http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users

Reply via email to