[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed.
http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf
I read his message as saying that NAT isn't an problem /he will be facing in what he is aiming to setup/. Given the context around his stuff, I wouldn't
be surprised if thats what he meant.
/ <-- emphasis|deemphasis things.
Very true, my apologies, I only saw what people had selected in their replies.
_______________________________________________
Asterisk-Users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
