> > I have no idea who Randy Bush is but I found it funny the first article > I found on him was a presentation on why NAT is evil espically for > voice. Now he asserts that NAT traversal is not needed. > > http://www.apnic.net/meetings/17/docs/sigs/policy/addrpol-pres-randy-nats.pdf >
I read his message as saying that NAT isn't an problem /he will be facing in what he is aiming to setup/. Given the context around his stuff, I wouldn't be surprised if thats what he meant. / <-- emphasis|deemphasis things. _______________________________________________ Asterisk-Users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
