On 2/10/06, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 10 February 2006 11:08, Leif Madsen wrote: > > The problem is that the mailing list server is setup in such a way > > that when I click reply, it wants to send directly to you, so instead > > I have to hit reply-all, which unfortunately, places your email in the > > To: header, and the [email protected] address in the CC: header. I've > > done it manually for this message so you don't get it directly, but I > > won't be doing it in future messages -- so I guess we need to bug > > Simon about this :) > > That's exactly how mailing list software SHOULD work. You should be using > your "reply to list" function, not "reply". In kmail it's simply 'L' instead > of 'R', and 'A' is reply to all. :-) > > I just checked on a colleague's Outlook system... Surprise of surprises, it > has no concept of a reply to list. I haven't really used my gmail account > but I would be flabbergasted if those folks didn't have such a function. > > ... preparing to be flabbergasted. :-)
...and see how easy it is to screw up? I just replied to Andrew with the following: "Turn on your flabbergastation as I use gmail exclusively, and there exists no such reply function." -- Leif Madsen. http://www.leifmadsen.com http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/asterisk
