On 2/10/06, Simon P. Ditner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I can alter the headers any way we like. The reason this list is run > this way is that it was recommended to prevent mail loops -- i.e. when > someone turns on their evil vacation auto-responder that doesn't > recognize the List- mail headers. The same way some people's email > clients don't see the List-Post: header *cough* *cough*. > > But i can turn the feature on and see how it goes.
Ah, that's a good point. Auto-replies would be very _very_ annoying. Now that I consider this, the current settings don't seem so bad. Can we go to the configuration from _then_? - No, we missed it. When? - Just now. When will _then_ be _now_? - Soon. > On 2/10/06, Dave Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Stop preparing and just do it already!" (did anyone see Spaceballs?) > > > > I'm using Gmail and noticed (often too late) that hitting 'reply' sends to > > an individual not to the list, and 'reply all' sends to the individual and > > cc's the list. > > > > The only way to acheive the behaviour you're looking for, and that I prefer > > personally, is to manually delete the TO address and move the CC up to the > > TO field. > > > > Would it be better if the list server used the list address in the > > 'reply-to' header field? I've never setup a mailing list so I'm not sure if > > this is possible or even desirable. > > > > Dave > > > > On 2/10/06, Andrew Kohlsmith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Friday 10 February 2006 11:08, Leif Madsen wrote: > > > > The problem is that the mailing list server is setup in such a way > > > > that when I click reply, it wants to send directly to you, so instead > > > > I have to hit reply-all, which unfortunately, places your email in the > > > > To: header, and the [email protected] address in the CC: header. I've > > > > done it manually for this message so you don't get it directly, but I > > > > won't be doing it in future messages -- so I guess we need to bug > > > > Simon about this :) > > > > > > That's exactly how mailing list software SHOULD work. You should be using > > > your "reply to list" function, not "reply". In kmail it's simply 'L' > > instead > > > of 'R', and 'A' is reply to all. :-) > > > > > > I just checked on a colleague's Outlook system... Surprise of surprises, > > it > > > has no concept of a reply to list. I haven't really used my gmail account > > > but I would be flabbergasted if those folks didn't have such a function. > > > > > > ... preparing to be flabbergasted. :-) > > > > > > -A. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > David Donovan > > Consultant > > Fulcrum Solutions > > > -- > | First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, > | then you win. -- Mohandas Gandhi > | > | The Toronto Asterisk Users Group > | Join the discussion group by visiting http://taug.ca > | or by sending email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- David Donovan Consultant Fulcrum Solutions
