Now you are talking :).   Yes, the $25,000 dollar question is why the * box did 
not have a T1 card in the first place, if in fact the folks are thinking to 
expand into greater work force.

Cheers!

----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Peng Li 
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Cc: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:24 PM
  Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk Platform.


  it's an interesting one. why dont' they just use a T1 in the * box?

  tks
  peng

   
  On 4/5/07, Mark Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
    Perhaps this was 'for future capacity' and /or the needs changed mid-way
    through the install... or this person is some wicked kind of  sales type... 
    it would have been interesting to hear the pitch to the client.

    On Thu April 5 2007 17:02:04 Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast wrote:
    > Nope.  Not at all...   T1, CSU/DSU,  Cisco1700,  Linksys, Refurb P3 w/512
    > MBRam, 8x SIP phones.
    >
    > Cheers!
    > Reza.
    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    >   From: Peng Li
    >   To: Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast
    >   Cc: TAUG
    >   Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 4:48 PM 
    >   Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk
    > Platform.
    >
    >
    >   HI Reza,
    >
    >   Do you mean that Cisco 1700 runs an Asterisk with a P3 chip inside as a
    > submodule?
    >
    >   tks
    >   peng
    >
    >
    >   On 4/5/07, Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    >     Can anyone advise me why one would want to use a Cisco 1700 connected 
    > to a T1 -- in a fairly new implementation and billed the client $1500 for
    > the 1700?     And if you were the conslutant, why would you want to 
connect
    > a $50 Linksys router to the 1700 in the first place? 
    >
    >     I've been called in as an expert witness to give my unbiased analysis,
    > and I have my theories.  However I also want to accompany my opinion with
    > other Asterisk & Cisco veterans here before I'm called to testify as an 
    > independent/neutral party.
    >
    >     Adds to the interesting twist I've seen one of the MOST EXPENSIVE
    > asterisk machines running on a P3 machine (never mind the configurations)
    > -- which has 2, 4 port Digium Cards -- sold for $25,000+ fairly recently. 
    > Heck if I sold a P3 for that much, I'd make sure the client got customer
    > service ABOVE AND BEYOND!
    >
    >     Cheers!
    >     Reza.



    --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
    To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
    For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to