This is interesting... it touches on a major point of failure of
Asterisk that I keep commenting on and maybe this is a major opportunity
for those on the list.

 

I wonder if anyone would be interested in having a group of "Certified
Asterisk Implementers" in the Toronto area (or something of that
sort)... or as someone reacted to this idea before "like an Asterisk
Co-Op")?

 

There are so many problems here... Telecom companies are "stable", in
the sense that if they implement a standard Nortel solution and go belly
up, there will always be another vendor there to pick up the business.
For Asterisk, there really is nothing there...

 

Unfortunately, as I'm sure everyone knows, telecom providers will get
whatever they can for each implementation. I'm looking right now at
helping a company that got suckered into a $100,000 hardware investment
and a 5 year contract worth about $500,000. This could easily have been
done with $50,000 first year and much less each year after using
Asterisk. So there lies the rub...

 

Asterisk is undefined. No marketing, no boundaries, nothings....

 

Clearly (at least to me) what is needed, is an organization that can put
in certain standards for example:

1.       Mandatory Peer review of solutions by all participants.

2.       Standardization on parts (or at least solutions) so there is
continuity

3.       Standardization of consulting rates, quotes, etc...

4.       Standardization of service providers for T1s, VoIP trunks,
etc... might also get discounts from providers.

5.       Standardization of recurring revenues (maintenance, price per
minute calls)

6.       Employment Pooling - A pool of commited people to work with to
do implementations (so it isn't "lone gun" solutions")

7.       Tight integration with enterprise solutions (Enterprise class
CRM, Email Systems (Outlook/Exchange), Instant Messaging)

8.       Implementation Documentation Standards & Archives

9.       Unified Support System

10.   Revenue Share for all people involved in implementations, support,
etc..

11.   Datacentre Standardization / Pricing

12.   I'm sure there are 10,000 other reasons...

 

What I am seeing is the deregulation of telecom, hardware implementation
costs dropping, per user license fees still entrenched... Asterisk has
nothing but opportunity but no one is competing with bell on $500,000
implementations. Right now, it's all still just an ant on a mountain...
and no offence, there isn't anything major nothing happening to make
that stop.

 

You can see small, non-community attempts to do this kind of stuff, with
Trixbox, etc...

 

Maybe I have my head in the clouds and I know it would be a major under
taking... Asterisk itself was... anyone care to join me?

 

Regards,

Chuck

 

 

From: Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: April-05-07 10:25 PM
To: TAUG
Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk
Platform.

 

Good points Dave!

 

So in this particular case, who ever the carrier is -- is responsible
for the T1 and Cisco upto the demarc.  If that's flaky, then the entire
thing is flaky.  

 

Who ever deployed the system and has given warranty for the products --
are responsible for tech support & professional services.  

 

Assuming this Cisco 1700 is provisioned by the T1 carrier -- it makes
sense to put in another router behind the Cisco - but if it were me, I'd
choose some higher end router with QoS behind the Cisco - to provide
priority over the VoIP packets versus internet surfing and email.  This
was not the case in this particular case.

 

If it were me, I'd provide all brand new equipment vs. refurb for the
price tag of $25,000 :).   

 

Cheers!

Reza.

 

 

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Dave Donovan <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

        To: [email protected] 

        Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:47 PM

        Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive
Asterisk Platform.

         

        I can't say specifically for this case, but as for the Cisco
box, I've seen this type of thing before.  Say, for instance, the
carrier mandates that the edge (demarc) device be a Cisco box of their
choosing for management purposes.  They can often ask the client to pay
for this.  Client doesn't have access to manage it so they put a Linksys
box on it to take the single IP they're given by the provider and NAT
it. 
        
        As for the price of the box, that seems a bit high.  I guess
you're really looking at a $200 machine with, what, $1000 (retail) worth
of cards in it, and 8 x $250 for high end phones.  If the installer used
Bell's roughly 100% markup on hardware, you're looking at no more than
$6000 for hardware.  
        
        Depending on how complex the professional services were, how
many changes the client made along the way etc, you'd have you decide
whether the rest is justified.   Professional services can be a big
chunk of these projects.  
        
        That's my take on it, for what it's worth.
        
        Dave

        On 4/5/07, Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast < [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: 

        Now you are talking :).   Yes, the $25,000 dollar question is
why the * box did not have a T1 card in the first place, if in fact the
folks are thinking to expand into greater work force.

         

        Cheers!

         

        ----- Original Message ----- 

                From: Peng Li <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  

                To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 

                Cc: [email protected] 

                Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:24 PM

                Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive
Asterisk Platform.

                 

                it's an interesting one. why dont' they just use a T1 in
the * box?

                 

                tks

                peng
                
                 

                On 4/5/07, Mark Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

                Perhaps this was 'for future capacity' and /or the needs
changed mid-way
                through the install... or this person is some wicked
kind of  sales type... 
                it would have been interesting to hear the pitch to the
client.
                
                On Thu April 5 2007 17:02:04 Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast
wrote:
                > Nope.  Not at all...   T1, CSU/DSU,  Cisco1700,
Linksys, Refurb P3 w/512
                > MBRam, 8x SIP phones.
                >
                > Cheers!
                > Reza.
                >
                > ----- Original Message -----
                >   From: Peng Li
                >   To: Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast
                >   Cc: TAUG
                >   Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 4:48 PM 
                >   Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most
expensive Asterisk
                > Platform.
                >
                >
                >   HI Reza,
                >
                >   Do you mean that Cisco 1700 runs an Asterisk with a
P3 chip inside as a
                > submodule?
                >
                >   tks
                >   peng
                >
                >
                >   On 4/5/07, Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
                >     Can anyone advise me why one would want to use a
Cisco 1700 connected 
                > to a T1 -- in a fairly new implementation and billed
the client $1500 for
                > the 1700?     And if you were the conslutant, why
would you want to connect
                > a $50 Linksys router to the 1700 in the first place? 
                >
                >     I've been called in as an expert witness to give
my unbiased analysis,
                > and I have my theories.  However I also want to
accompany my opinion with
                > other Asterisk & Cisco veterans here before I'm called
to testify as an 
                > independent/neutral party.
                >
                >     Adds to the interesting twist I've seen one of the
MOST EXPENSIVE
                > asterisk machines running on a P3 machine (never mind
the configurations)
                > -- which has 2, 4 port Digium Cards -- sold for
$25,000+ fairly recently. 
                > Heck if I sold a P3 for that much, I'd make sure the
client got customer
                > service ABOVE AND BEYOND!
                >
                >     Cheers!
                >     Reza.
                
                
                
        
--------------------------------------------------------------------- 
                To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

                 

         

Reply via email to