Good points Dave!

So in this particular case, who ever the carrier is -- is responsible for the 
T1 and Cisco upto the demarc.  If that's flaky, then the entire thing is flaky. 
 

Who ever deployed the system and has given warranty for the products -- are 
responsible for tech support & professional services.  

Assuming this Cisco 1700 is provisioned by the T1 carrier -- it makes sense to 
put in another router behind the Cisco - but if it were me, I'd choose some 
higher end router with QoS behind the Cisco - to provide priority over the VoIP 
packets versus internet surfing and email.  This was not the case in this 
particular case.

If it were me, I'd provide all brand new equipment vs. refurb for the price tag 
of $25,000 :).   

Cheers!
Reza.


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Dave Donovan 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 7:47 PM
  Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk Platform.


  I can't say specifically for this case, but as for the Cisco box, I've seen 
this type of thing before.  Say, for instance, the carrier mandates that the 
edge (demarc) device be a Cisco box of their choosing for management purposes.  
They can often ask the client to pay for this.  Client doesn't have access to 
manage it so they put a Linksys box on it to take the single IP they're given 
by the provider and NAT it. 

  As for the price of the box, that seems a bit high.  I guess you're really 
looking at a $200 machine with, what, $1000 (retail) worth of cards in it, and 
8 x $250 for high end phones.  If the installer used Bell's roughly 100% markup 
on hardware, you're looking at no more than $6000 for hardware.  

  Depending on how complex the professional services were, how many changes the 
client made along the way etc, you'd have you decide whether the rest is 
justified.   Professional services can be a big chunk of these projects.  

  That's my take on it, for what it's worth.

  Dave


  On 4/5/07, Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    Now you are talking :).   Yes, the $25,000 dollar question is why the * box 
did not have a T1 card in the first place, if in fact the folks are thinking to 
expand into greater work force.

    Cheers!

    ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Peng Li 
      To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
      Cc: [email protected] 
      Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 6:24 PM
      Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk 
Platform.


      it's an interesting one. why dont' they just use a T1 in the * box?

      tks
      peng

       
      On 4/5/07, Mark Borg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
        Perhaps this was 'for future capacity' and /or the needs changed mid-way
        through the install... or this person is some wicked kind of  sales 
type... 
        it would have been interesting to hear the pitch to the client.

        On Thu April 5 2007 17:02:04 Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast wrote:
        > Nope.  Not at all...   T1, CSU/DSU,  Cisco1700,  Linksys, Refurb P3 
w/512
        > MBRam, 8x SIP phones.
        >
        > Cheers!
        > Reza.
        >
        > ----- Original Message -----
        >   From: Peng Li
        >   To: Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast
        >   Cc: TAUG
        >   Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 4:48 PM 
        >   Subject: Re: [on-asterisk] Cisco 1700 and Most expensive Asterisk
        > Platform.
        >
        >
        >   HI Reza,
        >
        >   Do you mean that Cisco 1700 runs an Asterisk with a P3 chip inside 
as a
        > submodule?
        >
        >   tks
        >   peng
        >
        >
        >   On 4/5/07, Reza - Asterisk Enthusiast <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        >     Can anyone advise me why one would want to use a Cisco 1700 
connected 
        > to a T1 -- in a fairly new implementation and billed the client $1500 
for
        > the 1700?     And if you were the conslutant, why would you want to 
connect
        > a $50 Linksys router to the 1700 in the first place? 
        >
        >     I've been called in as an expert witness to give my unbiased 
analysis,
        > and I have my theories.  However I also want to accompany my opinion 
with
        > other Asterisk & Cisco veterans here before I'm called to testify as 
an 
        > independent/neutral party.
        >
        >     Adds to the interesting twist I've seen one of the MOST EXPENSIVE
        > asterisk machines running on a P3 machine (never mind the 
configurations)
        > -- which has 2, 4 port Digium Cards -- sold for $25,000+ fairly 
recently. 
        > Heck if I sold a P3 for that much, I'd make sure the client got 
customer
        > service ABOVE AND BEYOND!
        >
        >     Cheers!
        >     Reza.



        --------------------------------------------------------------------- 
        To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





Reply via email to