On Wed, 2007-05-16 at 16:49 -0400, Andrew Kohlsmith wrote: > On Wednesday 16 May 2007 4:33 pm, John Van Ostrand wrote: > > The presumption may be that you have other management ports that you > > want to be only available to a trusted network. > > Fair enough, but again it seems that iptables would make that easy to manage. > > Now a better firewall (multiple connections, etc.) would make my entire point > moot, but I was thinking more of the general, "small potatoes" kind of setup. > > I've simplified my life in a lot of ways, and one of them is requiring > businesses who want to do VOIP to have a dedicated link, or my maintenance > rates are more expensive otherwise. :-)
Ahh, I missed the "separate firewall" part of your post and assumed you meant "no firewall at all".
