Marc Gonzalez <mgonza...@freebox.fr> writes:

> The driver waits for this indicator before proceeding,
> yet some WCNSS firmwares apparently do not send it.
> On those devices, it seems safe to ignore the indicator,
> and continue loading the firmware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Hugues Husson <phhus...@freebox.fr>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <mgonza...@freebox.fr>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml
> index 7758a55dd3286..145fa1a3c1c6a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.yaml
> @@ -121,6 +121,14 @@ properties:
>        Whether to skip executing an SCM call that reassigns the memory
>        region ownership.
>  
> +  qcom,no-msa-ready-indicator:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      The driver waits for this indicator before proceeding,
> +      yet some WCNSS firmwares apparently do not send it.
> +      On those devices, it seems safe to ignore the indicator,
> +      and continue loading the firmware.

This sounds more like a firmware feature, not a hardware feature. What
about having a flag in enum ath10k_fw_features in firmware-2.bin?

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Reply via email to