Luke Arno wrote:
-1. in the core of the Atom protocol we need to do whichever approach
can best ensure interoperability between implementation.
I take it you have made up your mind based on this
false premise and are not interested in an honest
and exhaustive discourse.
Seeking to ensure core interoperability is a false premise? That's
rather interesting.
I haven't made up my mind about anything yet. All I want are some use
cases that support your position. Give me something I can chew on;
something you think will convince me that the way you think things
should be is the best solution given the alternatives that have already
been presented. I'm not even asking for proof that your solution is the
best possible solution. I believe that I have demonstrated on many past
occasions that I am extremely flexible on this stuff and have no problem
admitting when my stated position is proven to be the wrong approach
when there is evidence presented to that effect. In this case, no such
evidence has yet been provided.
Use cases. Describe for me a real world scenario that justifies your
argument. Once you do that, we'll have something real we can talk about.
- James
